With your way of viewing things, I think you're actually looking for the Sine, not the tangent - consider the behavior of tangent at 45 degrees.
There's actually more calculations that go in, and there's a reference point problem - it's a cool problem, I'm writing more up. My basic contention of there being a problem is that the way you're modeling it basically looks like 1) sight in 2) fire 3) rotate 4) fire 5) measure difference, while the more "accurate" behavior looks like 1) sight in 2) fire 3) rotate 4) sight in whilst canted 5) fire 6) measure.






Reply With Quote
