Granted I don't know much about explosives, but how is something stable enough to burn, but not carry out?
Granted I don't know much about explosives, but how is something stable enough to burn, but not carry out?
"There are no finger prints under water."
My guess is there is a lot more to this story that hasn't been released.
I am sure they have the evidence that is needed to charge the crimes that they are, usually a District Attorney would be part of that decision making process.
Lets not forget about the super accurate reporting that the news media gives us all
four, to be exact.
sorry Kev, I call em like I see em.
this is too dangerous to move, let's set it on fire! makes no sense to me.
If modern high explosives are inert without detonation, then why can't they be moved?
setting something alight is hardly what you'd call a controlled demolition, and a neighborhood is hardly the place to do it IMO.
now I never majored in EOD with a minor in rucking at big green U so I could be wrong.
I'm sure you're right, there's a lot more to this story that the glorious media is telling. I'll be eagerly awaiting a more in-depth explanation of the authorities plans and the reasoning behind it.
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2...-state-charge/
I'm certainly no explosives expert, but that sounds pretty scary. I wouldn't want to be the one to clean up the debris once the house has burned to the ground. The article says his house is rented. Forget bad neighbor, the thread title should read "Bad Tenant of the Year."The home is so cluttered and dangerous that experts have decided it is impossible to safely remove the chemicals and explosives and now intend to burn the house to the ground sometime next week.
It is believed the fire will consume and neutralize the explosives without igniting them. However, in an abundance of caution, a number of homes near the house will be evacuated prior to the fire being set.
"we expect it to burn, we don't expect it to detonate"
lol famous last words.
Wow. "what's inside?". "I didn't know." "Let's set it on fire. Yea!"
Sounds like the kind of thinking I would do![]()
Grandpa's Sheriff Badge, Littleton 1920's
I think the safest thing to do is to burn down all the houses around this house in a 1 block radius first. That way you create a decent fire brake. Plus, who knows what kind of dangerous and illegal things are in all those other houses? They haven't even been searched a little bit.
"There are no finger prints under water."
I clicked on all of the hot-links of the explosives in the story link and I've gotta say that *I * wouldn't want to be the one to try to move that stuff. Much of it is sensitive to friction and shock. That sounds like a recipe for disaster if it's moved - especially with all of the other explosives around - set one off and the rest could easily go off too.
What do you wanna bet many of the neighboring homes get destroyed in the process of burning this home down?
Ginsue - Admin
Proud Infidel Since 1965
"You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020
Ginsue's Feedback
Some of the recepies for homemade explosives use oxygen sensitive chemicals. Others are so unstable (the homemade PETN) That they are very unsafe to even be carried out from that home 10 to 15 feet.
If your job was to protect and serve for 45k to 60k a year would it be worth it to risk your life for some nutjob's idea of a good time? I would pass and torch it after doing the CSI and removing enough proof to put him away for a while.
Do they think they know what the garderer stepped on? Did this dude have so much of this junk that he just accidentally dropped some volatile substance out in the yard and didn't notice? An IED? What a bizarre story.
"I've got to make sure I water Mr. Jakubec's dais"
BOOM!!!!
"Ay Dios Mio!!!"
Do what you've always done and get what you've always gotten.