Close
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 38 of 38
  1. #31
    Drives the French Bus with animals on their tail
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Elizabeth
    Posts
    848

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by daddygat View Post
    Anyone had experience with Binoculars that have an Internal range Finder and Directional Compass. Came across the Barska brand of such. Thanks In Advance.

    Barska optics are fine for paper weights. That's about it.

    When it comes to optics and such, you get what you pay for.

    Buy once, cry once.

  2. #32

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pike10 View Post
    Are you guys heading to Raton this weekend?
    I ran down there. The weather was about what they predicted. Not too bad.

    The wind kinda sucked.

  3. #33
    daddygat
    Guest

    Default Thanks for the heads up

    Thanks for the heads up, will do more research rather than shelling out the $650.00 they want for the BARSKA 7x50 WP BATTALION model binoculars.

    Any thing more specific as to their usefulness as a paperweight? Bad optics, lousy construction???????,etc.

  4. #34
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    269

    Default

    Barska is shit.

    To answer the other question, binocular/LRF combination units such as the Leica Geovids (new) or the new Zeiss unit are useful because they work better for target location and spotting than a monocular (due to use of binocular vision and wider field of view).
    DEMIGOD LLC . THUNDER BEAST ARMS . COLORADO MULTI-GUN
    Can't send me a PM? Use email.

  5. #35
    Machine Gunner
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Cheyenne, Wyoming
    Posts
    1,530

    Default

    If you have the budget for it, Steiner also has LRF binos. Pretty pricey though.

  6. #36

    Default

    I've looked through both the 8x & 10x Geovids belonging to others over years.

    They were so bulky and heavy, I just wasn't impressed. Never liked them.

    I ran a nice set of compact binoculars and a nice LRF for years. Less cost. Less weight. Less bulk. Just seemed like a better setup.

    Based on expert recommendations, I went ahead and bought a set of range-finder binoculars. I went with the Zeiss Victory RF 10x45. I can't say they're any better than the Geovids. In fact the Geovid range-finding reticle may be superior.

    I used the Zeiss Victory RF 10x45 for the first time this last Sunday and the Sporting Rifle Match. I'm already sold.

    I won't say the Zeiss are the ones to get, but in practice range-finding binoculars are awesome.

    This is a case where "more than the sum of their parts" really rings true.

  7. #37
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Aurora, CO
    Posts
    145

    Default

    I tried out my Bushnell Fusions (as did others) at Raton this past weekend. The LRF functionality seemed excellent, even compared to the other LRFs I tried. The glass does have a tint to it compared to the high end options (i.e. Geovids), but for the price I'm very pleased.

    I suggest you look through a pair and try them out if you have an opportunity.

  8. #38
    Paper Hunter
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Between Erie and Frederick
    Posts
    136

    Default



    another option if your not worried about weight is a Bar and Stroud like mine here.(1942) It will range past any rifle capability.It's very accurate.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wXRtj4Hripo
    Last edited by jimmym40a2; 05-02-2011 at 16:48.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •