I modified your quote just to make a point!

However, I don't believe it is a '2A' issue. I heard some of those same arguments yesterday. If you agree that 'gun fire' can affect the health of someone who is shot, a case can be made for banning guns. If a person stands next to you with out a gun, your health is not being endangered.
Sounds just like Sarah or Rossie don't it. :wink:

As far as this quote it sent chills up my spine.

So, rtr it looks like we have to figure out how to balance property rights of a business with the obligations of a government to protect its citizens.
That is the very reason this country is going down the tubes. I agree with rtr and also would like to ask since when is it the govs job to keep us safe, house us, feed us and baby sit us ect. Simple it's not but more and more people in this country expect this and because of it this country will fail to remain a free nation.

I own a business and what I allow on on my property is my damn business nobody else’s. I do not smoke and do not allow smoking in my waiting area for the sake of my non smoking customers. I however have an area out in my shop were I allow my customers that smoke to smoke.

I am a grown man fully capable of taking care of myself I already have a mother and father. I don't need some jerkoff in a cheap suit with a bad combover passing laws for my safety. I would rather die of lung cancer tomorrow a free man then live to be 200 as a slave to the gov.