
Originally Posted by
Bailey Guns
I'm a little torn on this. I watched the video and read the far more comprehensive version of events from the SLC Tribune.
There is no excuse for the sloppy police work that led up to the execution of the warrant.
I also disagree with the no-knock warrant in this instance, as I do in most instances. I have issues, myself, with the so-called "war on drugs", it's effectiveness and cost to society. So I'm disappointed a no-knock warrant was used in this particular case.
Having said all that, when the officers entered, the officer who fired said he thought the object held by Blair may have been a sword. And they were only about 8' apart...not 20. The officer who fired was the first through the door and had moved to the right after advancing into the home. I can't really fault him for firing in this case.
Of course, without the warrant, whether or not he should have fired would've been a moot point.
It's very tragic anyway you look at it. But, given the circumstances, I agree the shooting itself (discounting all other factors) was justified. Judging the shooting in light of the totality of the circumstances is a different matter.