I am considering purchasing either one in the pistol version. i just cant make up my mind. Does anyone have any experience with either or both. Any input would be greatly appreciated.
I am considering purchasing either one in the pistol version. i just cant make up my mind. Does anyone have any experience with either or both. Any input would be greatly appreciated.
I had a gsg5 carbine. Neat little rifle with a high cool factor but didn't seem very well built. Screws and bolts liked to loosen up on it. I even had the bolt stop screw fall out on me once. Kinda soured my opinion of it. This of course was the original version. I have no idea how the post lawsuit models are designed.
No experience with the mp15-22.
if you are going to spend the money on either, look into a company called umarex. They have a full size HK 416 full size rifles (HK's version of the AR), and pistol versions, they also have an MP5 model. They have a contract with HK to build these though so the detail and workmanship is very good quality especially compared to that of the GSG. They have other gun models also.
If you make something idiot proof, someone will make a better idiot... Forget youth, what we need is a fountain of smart. There are no stupid questions, just a lot of inquisitive idiots.Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It's the transition that's troublesome. --Isaac AsimovLike, where's spyder been? That guy was like, totally cool and stuff. - foxtrot
I have the M&P 15-22 carbine and have been very happy with it. Duplicates the full size AR very well and is cheap and fun to shoot. JMHO![]()
Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to Fight, he'll just kill you.
I alsohave the M&P 15-22, love it. I have not shot the GSG but from everyhting I have read I agree with mutt that they might be a little lower in quality.
thanks for all your input. it sounds like the m&p is a better choice.