Close
Results 1 to 10 of 64

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #32
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lakewood
    Posts
    120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Byte Stryke View Post
    No Im Not.
    he didn't HAVE a gun, there was no danger, it was a child drawing a picture of how he felt as directed by his doctor.

    it was not a threat, it was an expression of his emotion.
    he did as an adult told him to do.

    you are the ones not getting the point


    its like me saying I am going to maroon you on Mars in a Puptent.
    without the means it is not a viable threat.
    If I am drawing how I feel as directed by a physician, its therapy.
    and if I am writing a sci-fi story its an imaginative expression.
    no, we get it. You don't think there is a problem until someone dies.



    You keep talking about how he was doing as an adult told him, that this wasn't a threat and he didn't have a gun but all of those facts are HINDSIGHT AFTER THEY CHECKED INTO IT. FFS... You wouldn't be defending him if he shot people or they found a gun cache in his bedroom but because they rightfully checked on the mental status of the kid and found nothing, we should go back in time and do nothing. lol

    By the way, no I'm not biased against the mentally ill one bit (although you are apparently a master at reading minds); they can't be held responsible for their actions any more than I can for hitting someone while coming out of anesthesia... what I AM biased against is the phychiatry field being unable to figure out which ones are a danger and which ones are not until someone dies and not having a system for making sure the dangerous ones stay on their meds.
    Last edited by weirjf; 03-04-2011 at 14:28.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •