Byte you are very clearly missing the point of his posts. Try reading the first one you quoted again.
Byte you are very clearly missing the point of his posts. Try reading the first one you quoted again.
"There are no finger prints under water."
No Im Not.
he didn't HAVE a gun, there was no danger, it was a child drawing a picture of how he felt as directed by his doctor.
it was not a threat, it was an expression of his emotion.
he did as an adult told him to do.
you are the ones not getting the point
its like me saying I am going to maroon you on Mars in a Puptent.
without the means it is not a viable threat.
If I am drawing how I feel as directed by a physician, its therapy.
and if I am writing a sci-fi story its an imaginative expression.
You must not have read Boosted's post. He said that he agreed that the kid shouldn't have been arrested, but that it should have been investigated further. No one knows if he has access to a gun or not until they look into it. I have to agree. If a teacher finds a kid drawing pictures depicting him shooting her, then she needs to investigate and find out what the deal is.
So far, everyone in this thread is in full agreement that going to the kid's house, especially AFTER they already looked into it, was way over played and shouldn't have been done.
"There are no finger prints under water."
no, we get it. You don't think there is a problem until someone dies.
You keep talking about how he was doing as an adult told him, that this wasn't a threat and he didn't have a gun but all of those facts are HINDSIGHT AFTER THEY CHECKED INTO IT. FFS... You wouldn't be defending him if he shot people or they found a gun cache in his bedroom but because they rightfully checked on the mental status of the kid and found nothing, we should go back in time and do nothing. lol
By the way, no I'm not biased against the mentally ill one bit (although you are apparently a master at reading minds); they can't be held responsible for their actions any more than I can for hitting someone while coming out of anesthesia... what I AM biased against is the phychiatry field being unable to figure out which ones are a danger and which ones are not until someone dies and not having a system for making sure the dangerous ones stay on their meds.
Last edited by weirjf; 03-04-2011 at 14:28.
Principle: Johnny, why did you draw this picture?
Jonny: Because Im Mad at Mr Teacher
Principle: why would you draw a picture like this?
Jonny: My Doctor told me too
Principle:do you have a gun?
Jonny: No
Principle: Call Johnny's Mother and Father and get me the number to This Doctor.
TADA!
Now... it wont cost the family thousands in Legal fees or the state Hundreds of thousands better spent on common sense projects like "Educator Training."
Instead of vilifying Kids for being Kids, we need to exercise discretion and common sense instead of leaping to a worst case scenario and pulling knee-jerk reactions.
I know, both very alien ideas in this day and age.
Maybe I Do have it wrong,
Maybe I Should have the old lady that accidentally bumped into me yesterday with her car door Arrested, her Grandchild taken into custody with CPS, charged the reckless old lady with attempted vehicular manslaughter and Impound her car. After all she did strike me with a portion of her motor vehicle...
Nope... used common sense, everyone went home happy.
![]()