Close
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lakewood
    Posts
    120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    No, we didn't know anything about the Scientology stuff until we got home and read the articles.



    I thought she looked pretty dumb and was openly groaning during her closing argument.

    The defense took the angle that since the police officer admitted to contaminating the scene, and that how he didn't know how one of the bullets ended up where it did, that there was a great chance that any scene diagrams are incorrect as well. That was her whole angle. It was mostly well presented, but toward the end she (defense counsel) really started pulling at straws and showing her own ignorance of firearm stuff.

    I'm just telling this to point out that what you said is true, and they tried to get a lesser charge in this case based off of potentially incorrect investigation and assumptions by the prosecutors based on those investigation results.
    Their defense antics are the same reason people are against citizens being able to carry guns. They think that because we can defend ourselves that when it actually happens... it ends up like the grocery store scene in "Wanted" with bullets flying everywhere and hollywood explosions.

  2. #2
    Fallen Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Smyrna, GA
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weirjf View Post
    Their defense antics are the same reason people are against citizens being able to carry guns. They think that because we can defend ourselves that when it actually happens... it ends up like the grocery store scene in "Wanted" with bullets flying everywhere and hollywood explosions.

    Exploding Doritos FTW!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •