"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

It is generally agreed that one of the purposes of a state run "Militia" is to defend against a tyrannical federal government, for example the beginnings of the revolution that bore our country.

When a leader unilaterally deploys federal military against american citizens, that sounds something like tyranny. Regardless of your taste for Trump's or anyone else's cool-aid. does this not raise your 2A alarm bells? It does mine and I've been surprised that this hasn't been discussed. Maybe I missed it.