Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1
    Paper Hunter Tweety Bird's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Rural Elbert County, CO
    Posts
    228

    Default Illinois at its finest

    Illinois AG wants to disclose the names of all gun owners in her state.

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-il-gunowners-disclos,0,5686959.story
    Dan

    Flying an airplane is just like riding a bicycle; it's just a lot harder to put cards in the spokes. - AIRPLANE! - 1980

    Blinkin! Fix your boobs! You look like a bleedin' Picasso! - Robin Hood: Men in Tights, 1993

    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups. - November, 2008

  2. #2
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lakewood
    Posts
    120

    Default

    Go for it. Then the criminals know the safe homes to rob and maybe those people will change their minds.

  3. #3
    Señor Bag o' Crap Scanker19's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    ABQ, NM
    Posts
    3,720

    Default

    This makes me want to buy a gun from a member here, just to bug them.
    Errrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
    Haw haw haw?..

  4. #4
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    "You potentially make us targets," Vandermyde said. "Or, on the inverse, you could say, 'These are the homes that don't have FOID cards so it's likely they don't have guns, so therefore they make better targets.'"

    The state police made the same argument, but the attorney general dismissed it as "speculative and conclusory."
    Funny demanding to know the names of people who have not committed any sort of crime isn't some how speculative and conclusory.

    EDIT: Is "Conclusory" even a word? Troubleco?
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  5. #5
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lakewood
    Posts
    120

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    Funny demanding to know the names of people who have not committed any sort of crime isn't some how speculative and conclusory.

    EDIT: Is "Conclusory" even a word? Troubleco?
    con·clu·so·ry (kn-kls-r)
    adj. 1. Conclusive.
    2. Law Convincing, but not so much so that contradiction is impossible; not justified or supported by all the facts:



  6. #6
    Rebuilt from Salvage TFOGGER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    7,784

    Default

    Fair's fair: Post the home addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers of state legislators, along with their schedules.

    THIS is the largest argument against any kind of registration for guns or their owners; some jackhole politician will decide that the rights of the peeeeple to "know" is more important than our right to privacy or security.
    Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...

    Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
    ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?

  7. #7
    Grand Master Know It All trlcavscout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Milliken
    Posts
    3,081

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by weirjf View Post
    Go for it. Then the criminals know the safe homes to rob and maybe those people will change their minds.

    I agree!

  8. #8
    M14PottyMouth bryjcom's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Windsor
    Posts
    1,900

    Default

    At least once a week I am reminded of why I moved from that hell hole of a state.

    To be fair the only reason the state sucks is because of the chicago metro area. Chicago should just apply for statehood and leave central and southern IL alone.

  9. #9
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFOGGER View Post
    Fair's fair: Post the home addresses, phone numbers, and social security numbers of state legislators, along with their schedules.

    THIS is the largest argument against any kind of registration for guns or their owners; some jackhole politician will decide that the rights of the peeeeple to "know" is more important than our right to privacy or security.
    More realistically, any elected officials should have every year of taxes they've ever paid,every loan, basically their entire credit history as public record. Those that they govern, have a direct interest in knowing how well those elected officials handle their own personal finances.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  10. #10
    Beer Meister DFBrews's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    With the classyish Hipsters...Stapleton
    Posts
    3,175

    Default

    So after having to jump thru the hoops to get a "card" that says your can use your 2A rights. You now have to worry about a press organisation flexing their 1A rights with lawsuits and other means to get a list of firearm owners. Which Amendment is the hot one these days 1A. I sadly see it happening
    You sir, are a specialist in the art of discovering a welcoming outcome of a particular situation....not a mechanic.

    My feedback add 11-12 ish before the great servpocaylpse of 2012

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •