Military option in Libya?

[ERNO]

I, fully support, the United Nations security council decision for a no fly zone in Libya, along with a tougher resolution that would authorize a fuller range of options, including the ability to bomb Libyan government tanks on the road to Benghazi in order to stop a looming humanitarian catastrophe there.

MQ, likes to label all of his oponent's as terrorists and supporter's of AQ. Though, the question of who these Libyan rebels are, lurks in everbodys minds.
MQ, and his two sons have to be removed from power, unless he calls for a total ceasefire.

NYT, SAT., March 19, 2011

" Shift by Clinton helped push Pres. Obama to take a harder line against Libya.

The administration's shift also, became possible only after the United States won not just the support of Arab countries but their active participation in military operations against one of their own.

France and Britain continued to press their hawkish position on Friday, saying they intend to take the lead in enforcing a no-flight zone.

A French official who spoke on condition of anonymity said that the possible targets for airstrikes would include the Qaddafi force's airfields and the long supply line running from Tripoli to the loyalist forces pressing towards Bengazi. 'The threat is there, which is why we want to act fast,' the official said. 'Libyan troops are only 150 kilometers from Bengazi,' or about 93 miles. A naval blockade was also a possibility."

[Mtn.man]

The FRENCH fired first strike.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42164455...ica/?gt1=43001

[Bailey Guns]

I, fully support, the United Nations security council decision for a no fly zone in Libya, along with a tougher resolution that would authorize a fuller range of options, including the ability to bomb Libyan government tanks on the road to Benghazi in order to stop a looming humanitarian catastrophe there.

MQ, likes to label all of his oponent's as terrorists and supporter's of AQ. Though, the question of who these Libyan rebels are, lurks in everbodys minds.
MQ, and his two sons have to be removed from power, unless he calls for a total ceasefire.

See what I mean? Liberals are all over the Libya thing. It's a "looming humanitarian crisis". Big fuckin' deal.

We've had humanitarian crises "in progress" all over Africa and various 3rd world countries for the 50 years I've been on the planet. Is it up to us to stop or to intervene in all of them? Why Libya? Especially since, by even your own admission, we don't really know who the "good guys" are we're supposed to be helping. As far as anyone knows the opposition could be a front group for al-Queda. Why not one of a hundred other places where gov't or rebel forces are slaughtering civilians?

Fuckin' liberals.