Quote Originally Posted by mitch View Post
Holy shit? The US Army shot and killed those protestors in front of the White House? We attacked them with mortar fire and F111's?

No?

Then why are we comparing arrest of a Daniel "Traitor" Eisenberg to the killing of women and children in Libya? Remind me again how arrest for refusing a UNLAWFUL order is the same as the military killing women and children?

Fixed it for you

and in Case you have forgotten due to state media influences
Hint: it's the first one.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Yeah, I didn't see "pay a state sanction tax" or "apply for permit" anywhere in there.

One thing so many subjects, I mean Citizens, are forgetting is that the Bill of rights is 24/7/365. Its not "only when its convenient" or "Whenever the state says it's OK"
INALIENABLE

convenience quote:
in·alien·able

adj
\(ˌ)i-ˈnāl-yə-nə-bəl, -ˈnā-lē-ə-nə-\
Definition of INALIENABLE

: incapable of being alienated, surrendered, or transferred <inalienable rights>

— in·alien·abil·i·ty \-ˌnāl-yə-nə-ˈbi-lə-tē, -ˌnā-lē-ə-nə-\ noun
— in·alien·ably \-ˈnāl-yə-nə-blē, -ˈnā-lē-ə-nə-\ adverb
.learners-link div.learners-link-content { font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 13px; padding: 0pt 5px 0pt 22px; }.learners-link div.learners-link-content a .word { text-decoration: none; }.learners-link div.learners-link-content a:hover .word { color: rgb(83, 88, 169); text-decoration: underline; }#content .definition div.d .learners-link a, #content .definition div.d .learners-link a:hover, #content .definition div.d .learners-link a:link, #content .definition div.d .learners-link a:visited { color: black; font-family: Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-variant: normal; font-size: 13px; text-decoration: none; } See inalienable defined for English-language learners »

Origin of INALIENABLE

probably from French inaliénable, from in- + aliénable alienableFirst Known Use: circa 1645



So, With all of that I ask you this:

Can any officer of the state/Union lawfully give an order that violates, restricts or removes a an inalienable right granted under the U.S Constitution?

Lawfully violating the amendments of the constitution?