Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 81

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

  2. #2
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Eastern Wyoming
    Posts
    574

    Default

    I wonder about the thought process that goes into making this kind of decision.

    " i need to park and get my hemorhoid cream. right now". " i will just speed things up by threatning someone with my gun", "what harm could come of it", "its not like someone is going to turn me in and I will go to jail" "ok, thats what I will do, pull a gun on a woman over a parking space."

    dumb fuck.

  3. #3
    Machine Gunner bellavite1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Wheatridge
    Posts
    1,960

    Default

    I'll be the Devil's advocate here:
    What if that bitch was PMS'ing and was actually driving toward the guy?
    Whatch the video guys, this is what he stated in the report.
    This could be why he was not charged on anything more.
    You know damn well that if he just pointed the gun whithout some sort of a good reason this would be a felony menacing charge, no questions asked...
    Isn't a car a weapon too?

  4. #4
    Caught Behind Enemy Lines
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    denver/plattsmouth
    Posts
    2,954

    Default

    wow , thats just fantastic , this a**hole is part of the problem .Just another nail in the gun rights coffin . Grrrr as a responsible gun owner id really like to smack the dog s*ht out of that guy .

  5. #5
    Machine Gunner SAnd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Denver
    Posts
    1,625

    Default

    Yea, Hang him, Screw him, we don't need any proof. The news media is always right. Nobody ever lies.

    I agree with bellavite1. There isn't enough information to say who was wrong. If she was trying to assault or threaten him with her car he could be justified. Maybe he should have just stayed in his car.

    I hope the truth comes out. This does illustrate the how serious it is to carry. No matter what the end result he is out a bunch of money.

  6. #6
    Recognized as needing a lap dance
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SW Missouri
    Posts
    5,540

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alxone View Post
    wow , thats just fantastic , this a**hole is part of the problem .Just another nail in the gun rights coffin . Grrrr as a responsible gun owner id really like to smack the dog s*ht out of that guy .
    This is exactly what law abiding gun owners and carriers do not need.

    I have not read all of the comments but he is probably lucky the other person was not another law abiding gun carrier...they could have defended themselves if a gun was pointed at them.

  7. #7
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Outside People's republic of boulder
    Posts
    803

    Default

    Its a lot of he said she said. I don't know if he is on this fourm(so forgive my lack of details) but a guy ridding his scouter on the shoulder and had his pistol on his belt and some guy almost hit him, and then guy on scouter flipped the bird and guy in car called the cops and said he pulled his gun on him. So Unless i was there I really can't say. just lots of ass holes out there

  8. #8

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bellavite1 View Post
    I'll be the Devil's advocate here:
    What if that bitch was PMS'ing and was actually driving toward the guy?
    Whatch the video guys, this is what he stated in the report.
    This could be why he was not charged on anything more.
    You know damn well that if he just pointed the gun whithout some sort of a good reason this would be a felony menacing charge, no questions asked...
    Isn't a car a weapon too?
    In a King Soopers parking lot, I would have had a ton of options. Pulling my gun on a woman would not have been one of them.

  9. #9
    Sifu Lex_Luthor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Commerce City
    Posts
    1,729

    Default

    First in line for his permit!

  10. #10
    BADGE BUNNY Monky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Englehood
    Posts
    5,447

    Default

    Wait a damn second here..

    His statement is that she started DRIVING TOWARDS HIM IN A CAR.. She refutes that... initial report done, and no charges are filed. She then whines to the city council (probably knew one of them) they put it in front of a liberal judge, and suddenly he's the bad guy.

    I'm sorry but 'disparity of force' comes into play when someone is in a fucking car driving at you. Disparity of Force is defined as a situation that any reasonable person would conclude places you at an overwhelming disadvantage in your effort to protect yourself against immediate and serious bodily injury.

    He drew his weapon, and pointed it at her vehicle. That was enough for her to cease her actions.

    Reverse the situation and remove your double standards of this poor defenseless woman driving.

    It's a woman out of her car, with a man driving towards her, she pulls her revolver.. Same situation.. yet you'll think it's warranted.

    Ever been hit by a car? 3k+ lbs moving even at 5mph isn't a love tap. At 15mph it HURTS like hell.

    Cops looked at surveillance video and could find no proof either way to support their claims..it became he said she said. They left it at that, lesson learned. But one party throws a fit, takes it to someone she knows on the council, who heard HER side of the story. Gives it to a judge HE knows.. and wham.. charges. Now the man legally carrying his firearm, who did not even have need to discharge, just present it, is made to look like the BG because a poor woman in a defenseless 3k_ lb blunt object was driving at him for a parking space..

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •