my much younger uncle is on Boulder SWAT. Its boulder county, not just boulder city. He works for another PD.
my much younger uncle is on Boulder SWAT. Its boulder county, not just boulder city. He works for another PD.
Last edited by HBARleatherneck; 04-05-2011 at 20:01.
When I saw this story on the news, EVERYONE in law enforcement that they showed on the cameras were all hanging out, smiling, and making jokes with each other. Not a single person looked the slightest bit serious. I thought to myself, "Well, looks like nothing to worry about here," and changed the channel. Glad it ended up okay.
"There are no finger prints under water."
A typical pistol suppressor is 300, not much more for rifle. They don't have to go through a dealer to get them, so no markup and they don't pay anything for NFA tax either (exempt). The HK416, IIRC, was 775 apiece when I went to a demo and asked.
HK's guns aren't really that expensive, one of the reasons they use them, they're only expensive on the civilian side because George Bush the 1st banned their importation and no president since has had the balls to rescind it.
fire you gun in the house, and you will know why they have suppressors.
in a building flash suppresion and sound suppression matter.
Its not a question of why LE/MIL uses them.
The point is, why can't WE THE PEOPLE have them. They don't increase the lethality of a firearm, they don't do anything dangerous, there's no reason to restrict them. Hell I've heard that in parts of Europe its considered rude to shoot at a range without one.
I suppose that's the mentality.
The libtards don't understand that those who use them for illegal activities rarely get them through legal channels... just like their firearms.
I'm one of those "firearm restrictions/gun control laws are unconstitutional and illegal" and "2A is my carry permit" people.
You CAN own both a suppressor, and a subgun. The subgun just can't be any newer than 1986.
"There are no finger prints under water."