Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 60

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Zombie Slayer Zundfolge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wichita, KS (formerly COS)
    Posts
    8,317

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KevDen2005 View Post
    ... I can see already the anti-police BS is already starting...
    I'm probably one of those that would get labeled a "cop basher" around here and even I can see how rulings like this actually make the lives of cops HARDER and not easier.

    ...even though probably all the LEO's are gonna be thinking the same thing the non-LEO's are.
    Well lets hope they're more vocal in their opposition to this ruling. While I agree that the vast majority of cops aren't going to like it any more than we do, there is still always a contingent that sees the constitution as an impediment (and those guys make it that much harder for the good cops).
    Modern liberalism is based on the idea that reality is obligated to conform to one's beliefs because; "I have the right to believe whatever I want".

    "Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.
    -Friedrich Nietzsche

    "Every time something really bad happens, people cry out for safety, and the government answers by taking rights away from good people."
    -Penn Jillette

    A World Without Guns <- Great Read!

  2. #2
    Varmiteer CMP_5.56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Thornton, CO
    Posts
    508

    Default

    I hope people don't take this as an anti cop thread. It's not, it is an anti lawmaker thread. This is a blatant case of lawmakers abusing their power. And wiping their ass with the Constitution.
    EMT-B

    Quote Originally Posted by Byte Stryke View Post
    Yeah, Leave it to our congress to be bipartisan when it comes to screwing the constitution.
    My Feedback

  3. #3
    Recognized as needing a lap dance
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SW Missouri
    Posts
    5,540

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CMP_5.56 View Post
    I hope people don't take this as an anti cop thread. It's not, it is an anti lawmaker thread. This is a blatant case of lawmakers abusing their power. And wiping their ass with the Constitution.

    I think the implications are even more than that...the branch of government that is supposed to interpret the right or wrong of something acted as a legislature, which is why this needs to go to the US Supreme Court

  4. #4

    Default

    the ruling is off, but i have to say that the incident that spurred it on was also off.

    if the police officer is there to investigate a domestic violence complaint there is no way they are going to take the husbands word that the wife is ok and doesn't need their help.

    in that instance i would say the cop is in the right to enter the home.

    now no defense against any entry by LEO is way off.
    Self control: The minds ability to override the body's urge to beat the living sh.. out of some ass.... who desperately deserves it.

    The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.

    Thomas Jefferson


    Obama, so full of crap it is a miracle Air Force One can even get off the ground,

  5. #5
    Recognized as needing a lap dance
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SW Missouri
    Posts
    5,540

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rockhound View Post
    the ruling is off, but i have to say that the incident that spurred it on was also off.

    if the police officer is there to investigate a domestic violence complaint there is no way they are going to take the husbands word that the wife is ok and doesn't need their help.

    in that instance i would say the cop is in the right to enter the home.

    now no defense against any entry by LEO is way off.

    I see what you are saying and given very little information, the officer could have entered upon exigent circumstances, even if only in the entry way to check the welfare of both parties, then left without causing further problems, but for some reason the court ruled that is was okay for officers to enter no-matter what and if they are wrong just fight it in court later...I disagree with that notion.

  6. #6
    Fallen Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Smyrna, GA
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    In before cop-bashing thread locked.

  7. #7
    Grand Master Know It All OneGuy67's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    2,513

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KevDen2005 View Post
    I see what you are saying and given very little information, the officer could have entered upon exigent circumstances, even if only in the entry way to check the welfare of both parties, then left without causing further problems, but for some reason the court ruled that is was okay for officers to enter no-matter what and if they are wrong just fight it in court later...I disagree with that notion.

    Yep!
    “Every good citizen makes his country's honor his own, and cherishes it not only as precious but as sacred. He is willing to risk his life in its defense and is conscious that he gains protection while he gives it.” Andrew Jackson

    A veteran is someone who, at one point in his life, wrote a blank check made payable to 'The United States of America ' for an amount of 'up to and including my life.'

    That is Honor, and there are way too many people in this country who no longer understand it.

  8. #8
    COAR SpecOps Team Leader theGinsue's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Colo Spr
    Posts
    22,088
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CMP_5.56 View Post
    I hope people don't take this as an anti cop thread. It's not, it is an anti lawmaker thread. This is a blatant case of lawmakers abusing their power. And wiping their ass with the Constitution.
    Quote Originally Posted by KevDen2005 View Post
    I think the implications are even more than that...the branch of government that is supposed to interpret the right or wrong of something acted as a legislature, which is why this needs to go to the US Supreme Court
    OneGuy & KevDen are right. Remember we have 3 branches of government: Executive (to apply the laws), Legislative (to make the laws), and the Judicial (to interpret laws and provide for justice [to state this ultra simply: determine guilt or innocence and ensure RIGHTS are not violated in the process]).

    Law Enforcement falls under the Executive branch. THANK HEAVENS this branch isn't part of THIS discussion.

    The courts are part of the Judicial system are are NOT supposed to be legislating from the bench. But, this is exactly what they've done in this case.

    Quote Originally Posted by rockhound View Post
    the ruling is off, but i have to say that the incident that spurred it on was also off.

    if the police officer is there to investigate a domestic violence complaint there is no way they are going to take the husbands word that the wife is ok and doesn't need their help.

    in that instance i would say the cop is in the right to enter the home.

    now no defense against any entry by LEO is way off.
    As KevDen stated/implied, the fact that this ruling specifically says citizens have "no right to resist unlawful police entry into their homes" is the biggest crux here. Unlawful is the key. I can't see this standing and not getting stuck dow by the U.S. Court of Appeals. If it does, liberty is truly dead.
    Last edited by theGinsue; 05-14-2011 at 01:38.
    Ginsue - Admin
    Proud Infidel Since 1965

    "You can't spell genius without Ginsue." -Ray1970, Apr 2020

    Ginsue's Feedback

  9. #9
    Machine Gunner spyder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Salt Lake City
    Posts
    5,447

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Uberjager View Post
    Wow! Not a single crazy sh#&bird in this thread stating you shouldn't be upset, if you have nothing to hide.
    Quote Originally Posted by Elhuero View Post
    you guys need to cut this anti cop spew.

    if you have nothing to hide you should welcome them in and thank them for their service.

    and if you don't want them in your home then, well... you must have something to hide.
    Well I'm glad you two are ok with having no personal space. I for one am glad that a law enforcement officer cannot invade my space without a very good reason and in most cases, a warrant. I don't have anything to hide, but my space is plain and simply black and white, my space call it greed or whatever you want, but come into my house uninvited and you're in trouble.
    Quote Originally Posted by KevDen2005 View Post
    All I'm going to say is that I think it is a really bad ruling by the Indian Supreme Court and I have no doubt, giving the implications of the ruling, the dissenting opinions, and the precedent of case law before it that this will be appealed. I certainly don't agree with the ruling at all.

    As for Colorado (and I would assume other states as well) there are really specific guidelines that an officer must follow before entering a home without a warrant and in many of those cases a warrant will still be needed.

    That's all I have to say on that because I can see already the anti-police BS is already starting, even though probably all the LEO's are gonna be thinking the same thing the non-LEO's are.
    Unfortunately the cops there are going to be hated even more for the stupid ruling. That sucks because I am guessing that most of the cops there think it is a stupid rule also.
    Quote Originally Posted by Byte Stryke View Post
    In before cop-bashing thread locked.
    I just thought this was funny.
    If you make something idiot proof, someone will make a better idiot... Forget youth, what we need is a fountain of smart. There are no stupid questions, just a lot of inquisitive idiots.
    Life is pleasant. Death is peaceful. It's the transition that's troublesome. --Isaac Asimov
    Like, where's spyder been? That guy was like, totally cool and stuff. - foxtrot

  10. #10
    Zombie Slayer Zundfolge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wichita, KS (formerly COS)
    Posts
    8,317

    Default

    Originally Posted by Elhuero
    you guys need to cut this anti cop spew.

    if you have nothing to hide you should welcome them in and thank them for their service.

    and if you don't want them in your home then, well... you must have something to hide.

    Quote Originally Posted by spyder View Post
    Well I'm glad you two are ok with having no personal space.

    Spyder, you should probably go read this.
    Modern liberalism is based on the idea that reality is obligated to conform to one's beliefs because; "I have the right to believe whatever I want".

    "Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.
    -Friedrich Nietzsche

    "Every time something really bad happens, people cry out for safety, and the government answers by taking rights away from good people."
    -Penn Jillette

    A World Without Guns <- Great Read!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •