Patriot Act For/Against?

[Ronin13]

I just read something that my political science professor (one of the few who claims to be a hardened anti-liberal teacher, but also not really for the GOP either) handed out back when I was a freshman in college and it states that he and other political science doctorate holders did a study on Jefferson's ideals for America as it was being created... I'll list only a couple:
1. The Constitution is an amendable, living document not meant for long term application but for when a 2nd, 3rd, 4th and so on American Revolution occurs (recommended every 25-80 years- depending on how soon American Government forgets that this country harbors the ideals and love of revolt) it can be used as a template for newer, better, and time appropriate constitutions.
2. The Bill Of Rights (believed to be kept intact regardless of revolution) is a time transcending document with the ability to add, amend, and be interpreted by lawyers, The Supreme Court and educational institutions with emphasis that the 10 Amendments originally enacted NEVER [made that the key word] be modified, forgotten, ignored or deleted without 75% of the population's consent.
3. God- regardless of which religion- shall not be used as a cornerstone of any state function, electoral campaign, policy writing, or law. Also, no American shall be judged by what God he chooses to worship, but only how they act with regard to influence of that God. No one should be forced into any religious ideal against their will, and we shall ensure that freedom be preserved, especially with that right in mind.

[Graves]

Against it for obvious reasons.

[68Charger]

I think the quote Ronin posted from Ben Franklin sums it all up in one sentence... I was going to post it, but he beat me to it.

the "version" I prefer is:
"People willing to trade their freedom for temporary security deserve neither and will lose both." - Benjamin Franklin

the REAL question is- is that what they're going for, or are they just ignorant?

[josh7328]

we let the terrorists win if we abridge our freedoms because of their actions.

we need to be as free as possible, and when we find a terrorist deal with them in the harshest manner possible.

just so everyone understands my definition of "harsh", when a suicide bomber attacks troops in afghanistan, we id them then delete their whole family.

everyone related to them joins them in martyrdom. the families of the 19 hijackers? uh huh, I went there.

I agree with bailey, there are parts of it that are worth keeping, but I voted no.

one of the things that bush did after 9/11 was to create a new agency, I think that's the last bloody thing we needed. we need to shut half the government down, now, or we'll end up worse than greece.