Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 20

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Johnstown
    Posts
    331

    Default Minnesota government shutdown begins after talks fail.

    http://news.yahoo.com/minnesota-government-shutdown-near-talks-fail-040624788.html



    This is what needs to start happening at the federal level. But, the agencies that should be shutdown first are the ones that redistribute the wealth to others. Theft is not a viable form of government, and it is not in the Constitution(the guidelines for the government) anywhere. After those agencies are shutdown we can start going after the rest of them.




  2. #2
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    INVALID LOCATION LISTED
    Posts
    82

    Default

    We have a place in Minnesota, land of ten thousand taxes. I can tell you that no tax payer will miss the government there. But the problem is, in that land of the ultimate nanny government, that there are so many people on the public dole, as government has expanded to become everything to everyone, that they constitute a huge voting bloc of the citizenry now. They will miss their entitlements, that's for sure! And they will make the republicans pay for missing their checks for a week or two. The battle is, unfortunately, lost in Minnesota already.

  3. #3
    Fleeing Idaho to get IKEA Bailey Guns's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Oklahoma
    Posts
    16,454
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default

    I keep hearing from the democrat leadership(?) that the rich need to pay a little more than their fair share to help us out of this financial mess we're in (on a national level...but it probably applies to MN as well).

    Well my question to democrats is, "Why?"

    Why do I continue to hear Harry Reid and others tell me and the entire country that we need to raise taxes on the rich (or anyone else for that matter) to help us out of this financial disaster? How is it that the "rich" folks got us into this mess?

    It was politicians of both parties that got us into this mess. It wasn't the poor, the middle class or the rich. It's not the fault of the "people", regardless of their means, that we're in this mess. It was the house and senate and president's fault.

    They all were complicit in creating/supporting/signing the programs that recklessly spent our money and brought us to the brink of bankruptcy. Why the fuck are we not telling them "no more money!"? They're all guilty of malfeasance and we're doing nothing to hold them accountable.

    Politicians really piss me off. Democrats make me absolutely homicidal.
    Stella - my best girl ever.
    11/04/1994 - 12/23/2010



    Don't wanna get shot by the police?
    "Stop Resisting Arrest!"


  4. #4
    Fallen Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Smyrna, GA
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    ya know... I don't have a PHD in economics, I am by no means a political science major and I have never held a public office. But I honestly don't believe it takes any of that to get us out of this mess, as a matter of fact I think its the over-complication of all of this that got us here.

    If you dont have it, dont spend it!

    Who in the fuck decided "deficit spending" was OK?

    "Hey Honey, I was just laid off and have no foreseeable employment, Lets go buy a car!"



    It's high time to tighten the belt and trim the fat, I suggest we start at the top.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Byte Stryke View Post

    Who in the fuck decided "deficit spending" was OK?
    George Washington did at the urging of Alexander Hamilton. The Federal Government took all states outstanding debts at the end of the Revolution War and incurred a deficit to develop an international credit rating. Then the Federal government took loans out with various countries to use in development. Jefferson was adamantly against this plan, but Washington was essentially for developing a strong Federally centric Government. Hamilton also established the first Federal banking system and bank at the same time this was all happening.

    So, the short answer to your question is: blame Alexander Hamilton.
    Mom's comin' 'round to put it back the way it ought to be.

    Anyone that thinks war is good is ignorant. Anyone that thinks war isn't needed is stupid.

  6. #6
    Machine Gunner Hoosier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Stone City
    Posts
    1,518

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SA Friday View Post
    George Washington did at the urging of Alexander Hamilton. The Federal Government took all states outstanding debts at the end of the Revolution War and incurred a deficit to develop an international credit rating. Then the Federal government took loans out with various countries to use in development. Jefferson was adamantly against this plan, but Washington was essentially for developing a strong Federally centric Government. Hamilton also established the first Federal banking system and bank at the same time this was all happening.

    So, the short answer to your question is: blame Alexander Hamilton.
    Glad to see some people paid attention in Civics.

    H.

  7. #7
    Paper Hunter hkOrion's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Littleton, CO
    Posts
    138

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SA Friday View Post
    George Washington did at the urging of Alexander Hamilton. The Federal Government took all states outstanding debts at the end of the Revolution War and incurred a deficit to develop an international credit rating. Then the Federal government took loans out with various countries to use in development. Jefferson was adamantly against this plan, but Washington was essentially for developing a strong Federally centric Government. Hamilton also established the first Federal banking system and bank at the same time this was all happening.

    So, the short answer to your question is: blame Alexander Hamilton.
    Irony here, I'm reading his biography and the author stated that people would blame him for the current state of the banking system. ROFL.

  8. #8
    Guest
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Johnstown
    Posts
    331

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bailey Guns View Post
    Why do I continue to hear Harry Reid and others tell me and the entire country that we need to raise taxes on the rich (or anyone else for that matter) to help us out of this financial disaster? How is it that the "rich" folks got us into this mess?

    It was politicians of both parties that got us into this mess. It wasn't the poor, the middle class or the rich. It's not the fault of the "people", regardless of their means, that we're in this mess. It was the house and senate and president's fault.

    They all were complicit in creating/supporting/signing the programs that recklessly spent our money and brought us to the brink of bankruptcy. Why the fuck are we not telling them "no more money!"? They're all guilty of malfeasance and we're doing nothing to hold them accountable.
    Very well put. Why should the successful people be punished by the politicians who spent our Nation into unsustainable debt?

  9. #9
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Woodland Park
    Posts
    692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by colocowboy01 View Post
    http://news.yahoo.com/minnesota-government-shutdown-near-talks-fail-040624788.html



    This is what needs to start happening at the federal level. But, the agencies that should be shutdown first are the ones that redistribute the wealth to others. Theft is not a viable form of government, and it is not in the Constitution(the guidelines for the government) anywhere. After those agencies are shutdown we can start going after the rest of them.


    I concur.

  10. #10
    Machine Gunner Hoosier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Stone City
    Posts
    1,518

    Default

    This is the bit that's fucked up:



    I'm certain no one on this forum is in the top 0.1% of income earners, and likely no one here has ever even known anyone in that group. The people at the very top, the people who buy influence in Washington, have been able to milk the system to the detriment of everyone else. In lieu of any better way to prevent them from being able to game the system, I think raising taxes is entirely fair. They did not go from being hundred-millionaires to billionaires on the back of their hard work or creativity. The idea that these people are the "job makers" has been proven wrong. They are the people who made billions betting against the US economy in 2007, the people who ship your jobs over seas where they make an extra thirty cents a share. These are not your idols.

    If this graph had been staying consistent over time, I would be opposed to changes.

    H.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •