Norway Bombing

[TFOGGER]

I dunno. I was raised as an old school gentleman/warrior. Women and children (as long as they're noncombatants) are sacrosanct. As are hospitals and houses of worship. Terrorists that victimize civilians and then try to claim the protections of the conventions of war are NOT "holy warriors", not soldiers, not deserving of respect. They are nothing more than criminals, murderers, and thugs. The lawyer for this joker is now claiming that he is probably insane. My question is: Why should this matter? It's obvious that no SANE individual would have perpetrated these crimes. He's still guilty of 90+ counts of premeditated murder in cold blood. I stand by the previous statement concerning feeding him feet first into a wood chipper, after a Mossad style interview...

I get seriously annoyed by the concept of Not Guilty by reason of Insanity, as if that excuses an atrocity like this. Perhaps we need to consider a verdict of Guilty AND Insane as a possible outcome for a trial.