Seems wrong to me...

[SA Friday]

The USSS is going to rent the property that gives them the best capability to complete their mission. If thats on his property, then its on his property. Going further away from your principle to please those at don't like they pay Biden rent is just stupid. Having been involved and led more than a few high level protective service details, I'm getting the closest property to my principle, period. I personally prefer the room right next to theirs.

If they are using his real-estate to complete their mission, then why should he have to forfeit profit from that property simply because he's an elected official. Personally, I think the govt paying for use of the property a reflection of our capitalism system, and right.

[nynco]

SA Friday said it better than me. I agree...

[nynco]

Hollohas, also to think this is not about attacking Obama is to be naive. They are going after the VP, which is pretty much the same thing as the president.

As to what Ranger said about me and my sources. That is his right.

[hollohas]

The USSS is going to rent the property that gives them the best capability to complete their mission. If thats on his property, then its on his property. Going further away from your principle to please those at don't like they pay Biden rent is just stupid. Having been involved and led more than a few high level protective service details, I'm getting the closest property to my principle, period. I personally prefer the room right next to theirs.

If they are using his real-estate to complete their mission, then why should he have to forfeit profit from that property simply because he's an elected official. Personally, I think the govt paying for use of the property a reflection of our capitalism system, and right.

I don't disagree. And thanks for your non-bias insight.

Like my OP said, I'll reserve judgement. I just wanted to point out it feels a little wrong even if it's the best way.