Palin's not my first choice (actually not any of my choices) but I don't think she is the dumb twit that she was portrayed as. The left media steamrolled her because she was a major hiccup in their plan to crown Obama as king (and Lord and Savior). I watched the documentary (done BY A DEMOCRAT by the way) and found it interesting, but it also confirmed that while she's not as dumb as a box of rocks I don't think she's the person to have at the helm either.
Would we be better off with Palin instead of Obama? I think it would be different but bad in different ways. Depends on which devil you want. Obama seems dead set on destroying our country through terrible economic decisions, while Palin I think would be more passive and probably struggle to make the tough decisions.
Obama is a post turtle, plain and simple. Palin is a post turtle. McCain is a twit. Bush was NOT a great president but made some good decisions. Believe me, I wish we could have OUR Clinton (popular, charismatic, seemingly intelligent - but he was also a post turtle), but the playing field is narrowed by what I would consider to be whackjobs like Ron Paul.





Reply With Quote

