Close
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 21
  1. #11
    Gong Shooter gcrookston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    356

    Default

    I have noted no change in accuracy. POI does shift 0.25 MOA but this is the result of the extra weight expressed upon the barrel and not any influence from the suppressor to the bullet upon leaving the muzzle of the barrel. The groups remain dense, just down and to the right from zero (one click up, one click left and they're going where they are supposed to).

    "The trouble with the internet is validating sources"-- Abraham Lincoln

    "Don't believe everything you read on the internet. That's how World War One started"-- Gen. Curtis E. LeMay

  2. #12
    Stamp Licker/Whore TriggerHappy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Saudi Aurora
    Posts
    2,293

    Default

    I'll shoot mine Monday and let u know.

  3. #13
    Missing Man on a Milk Carton islandermyk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    5,936

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tmckay2 View Post
    typcially people see a .5" - 1" POI change depending on the range and of course the shooter. its easy enough to compensate for or just zero around.
    Quote Originally Posted by gcrookston View Post
    I have noted no change in accuracy. POI does shift 0.25 MOA but this is the result of the extra weight expressed upon the barrel and not any influence from the suppressor to the bullet upon leaving the muzzle of the barrel. The groups remain dense, just down and to the right from zero (one click up, one click left and they're going where they are supposed to).

    So I'm guessing that accuracy of the firearm is not effected just the POI. So here's another question to add to that: The length of the suppressor.. I take it these cans are designed for specific rounds and pressures. Which would perform (accuracy, quieter, etc...) better, a shorter or longer can?

    Thank you guys for all the cool info...
    Whore monger Mike!

    Slinging coconuts since ever since...

  4. #14
    Missing Man on a Milk Carton islandermyk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    5,936

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TriggerHappy View Post
    I'll shoot mine Monday and let u know.
    OOohhh Yeeaah
    Whore monger Mike!

    Slinging coconuts since ever since...

  5. #15
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    The length of the can should only affect the sound and internal pressures. Shouldn't affect the range you are able to shoot at.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  6. #16
    Missing Man on a Milk Carton islandermyk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    5,936

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    The length of the can should only affect the sound and internal pressures. Shouldn't affect the range you are able to shoot at.
    I was thinking the same... adding that the longer can will also add more weight... hhhmmm... You think the longer can will also reduce the recoil?
    Whore monger Mike!

    Slinging coconuts since ever since...

  7. #17
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Well it could. If longer means more weight and more gas diversion, I'd say that it would. Can't say how much though.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  8. #18
    Gong Shooter gcrookston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    356

    Default

    There is no noticeable reduction in recoil. My rifle can is a YHM Phantom that I use with QD's on 7.62 and 5.56. It's steel and it's heavy. I have another YHM (Cobra .45), which is aluminum, quite light.
    "The trouble with the internet is validating sources"-- Abraham Lincoln

    "Don't believe everything you read on the internet. That's how World War One started"-- Gen. Curtis E. LeMay

  9. #19
    RIP - IN MEMORIAM - You will be missed
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    720

    Default

    With my TBAC 30P on both my 308 and 260 there is a large decrease in recoil . It also changes the recoil impulse by making it longer and softer . The other suppressed stuff that I have shot , 22lr to 338 Lapua mag has reduced recoil . In my experience a suppressor works almost as good as a good muzzle brake and the main difference being with a brake you still get the quick sharp recoil impulse .

  10. #20
    65 yard Hail Mary
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Parker CO
    Posts
    2,981

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by islandermyk View Post
    I was thinking the same... adding that the longer can will also add more weight... hhhmmm... You think the longer can will also reduce the recoil?
    It would depend on the can. As gcrookston said, the aluminum (and other lightweight materials) ones are surprisingly light.

    Then there's always the A.R.I.E.S. Suppressor, if you want a massive lightweight suppressor (carbon fiber, your barrel length + a few inches).


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •