Close
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Gong Shooter CUatTheEnd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Windsor, CO
    Posts
    411

    Default

    Even the scope is old. 1962 Bausch and Lomb Balvar 8 (2.5 x 8) in which the zero is set in the mount not the scope so you can change guns without losing your zero. Interesting.
    Last edited by CUatTheEnd; 08-16-2011 at 20:26.

  2. #2
    Gong Shooter leatherneck448's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Larkspur
    Posts
    406

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CUatTheEnd View Post
    Even the scope is old. 1962 Bausch and Lomb Balvar 2.5 x 8 in which the zero is set in the mount not the scope so you can change guns without losing your zero. Interesting.

    bausch and lomb made scopes?
    news to me

  3. #3
    Gong Shooter CUatTheEnd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Windsor, CO
    Posts
    411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leatherneck448 View Post
    bausch and lomb made scopes?
    news to me
    Yeah, check it out http://www.rifle-scope-guide.com/bau...d-lomb-scopes/

  4. #4
    Gong Shooter leatherneck448's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Larkspur
    Posts
    406

    Default

    they surprisingly look like really good scopes.
    interesting....

  5. #5
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    golden
    Posts
    650

    Default

    I think I have a very early long action 700. My serial number is in the very low 40,000's. Chambered in 7mm mag.

    So far I've dura coated all the metal. New Laminate stock from boyds. New base and rings. No need for trigger work this one is old school Remington.
    Have a new unfired Remington factory barrel in 7mm mag I need to have put on for me. New gun with a sweet old butter smooth action.

  6. #6
    Retired Admin
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    12,932

    Default

    Ok this brings up a question, when I was at CST the instructor said that anything that predates 1972-73 was not up to the pressures of the "newer" smokeless powder and shouldn't be shot.
    BS?



    ohh BP......

  7. #7
    Gong Shooter CUatTheEnd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Windsor, CO
    Posts
    411

    Default

    If anyone has any insite to this that would be good to know.


    Quote Originally Posted by Mazin View Post
    Ok this brings up a question, when I was at CST the instructor said that anything that predates 1972-73 was not up to the pressures of the "newer" smokeless powder and shouldn't be shot.
    BS?



    ohh BP......

  8. #8
    Gong Shooter leatherneck448's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Larkspur
    Posts
    406

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mazin View Post
    Ok this brings up a question, when I was at CST the instructor said that anything that predates 1972-73 was not up to the pressures of the "newer" smokeless powder and shouldn't be shot.
    BS?



    ohh BP......

    maybe he meant to say 1872 or 1873?

    I call BS...... If this is true, why do you see pre-64 model 70's all the time?
    IMO, metallurgy from this period isnt something to worry about. Somebody may be able to prove me wrong on this, but until I see a gun from this period grenaded, I'm not havin it......

    PICS OR IT DIDNT HAPPEN!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •