Originally Posted by
Mobat555
Out of 44 presidents we had how many are there that did not practice some sort of Christianity (unless you don't count Catholicism)? None, so I guess my response would be that religious affiliation does not always have a bearing on their character.
The religions practiced by our presidents don't have their followers kill/convert the "infidels."
While my statement is farfetched about Allah, makes you ponder the idea of church and state separation. If another religion gained the majority it would more then likely attempt to force that religions ideals on the population. Look at Europe where the mass exodus of [Muslim] immigrants is threatening their way of life and attempting to instill sharia law.
Looks like you've answered your own question here.
January 3 2007 and March 11 2008 Muslims were elected to congress. If we truly were at war with the religion then why is it freely practiced here?Because we have Freedom of Religion, and that's a double-edged sword.... one that we're now falling on. Allowing Muslims to serve as elected officials is absolutely ridiculous. We wouldn't think of electing a Communist into public service during the Cold War.
Reply With Quote
