Well he responded and the plot thickens. He signed that email with an alias he is actually in Montreal Canada go figure. I removed his real name from this email since I did not ask his permission to post it publicly.

Are you saying that the students should of had firearms at the time to defend themselves, and that it would of avoided the tragedy? That is rediculous. A problem cannot be solved by reinforcing elements which caused the problem in the first place, this is not complicated.

I understand that firearms are used in 'sport' and that some people just like shooting bullets for fun at a target or what have you, but if I had to choose in between getting rid of gun owning all together and avoiding them getting in the hands of dangerous people or the current situation, I would count the loses of the 'sport' instead of loses of life.

The NRA is not wrongful, gun owners who shoot little birds are within the law, but the system still permits deranged individuals to obtain the means to shoot innocent people.

It is important to look at the big picture; guns kill people. Let's wake up and get them out of the hands of civilians at the cost of the 'sport' as you call it.

Two weeks ago Kimveer Gill entered Dawson College, which I attended for three years and is down the street from where I now attend university, and shot students, killing one.

This is what woke me up.

Sinbad xxxxxxxxxx
Montreal, QC

(Now that we are having an indepth discussion, I feel like I should sign non-anonymously)
This is my response I know I'm beating a dead horse but I have to at least make this bozo think.

I never implied that we should arm the students. The faculty should be armed as they are responsible for protecting the students. The very thing you support is what caused the problem in the first place. A criminal with a gun entered a gun free zone what part of that do you not understand? How often do you hear about a criminal entering a police station to take hostages or a gun store? That's right you never hear it because the people in these places are armed and the criminal has no chance of succeeding.

You clearly have not thought this out in a rational manner. You can't get rid of guns no more than you can get rid of drugs. What part of the term "Criminal" do you not understand? These people don't care what the law is they will always find ways to do harm. This is something no law can ever stop. Look at the UK they banned guns and crimes with guns are skyrocketing.

You're correct it is important to look at the big picture People kill People. A gun is an inanimate object it can not kill anybody. People kill people with guns, knives, air planes over 3,000 on September 11th, McVeigh killed 168 people with a Ryder truck and fertilizer, baseball bats, automobiles, poisons, matches etcetera.

Once again a criminal entered Dawson College and shot innocent civilians. These civilians had no way to defend themselves and became easy prey. I carry a gun 24/7 if a criminal tries to harm me I have the means to defend myself. You are advocating taking away my god given right of self preservation. The only people who would abide by a gun ban are the civilians who are not the problem in the first place.

You truly live in a fantasy world if you honestly believe that banning guns would take them away from criminals. In the end each one of us is responsible for our own safety. If you choose to cower in fear and wait for the police to come and draw a chalk line around your body that’s your choice. I and many others choose to defend ourselves and wait for the police to come draw a chalk line around the criminals body.

Tim Feuerstein
Coloradoshooting.org (HunterCO)