Close
Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 40

Thread: Obama????

  1. #21
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Park County
    Posts
    204

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brokenscout View Post
    If he does get re-elected will there be riots? If he doesn't get re-elected will there be riots? And of course we will all be racists
    Why can't these people wrap their mind around the fact that people don't hate him because of his looks. It is because of the vacuum between his ears.
    I'm not a racist, I'm a cretinist. (someone who can't stand cretins)

  2. #22
    Industry Partner BPTactical's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    North Metro
    Posts
    13,955

    Default

    There will be discontent regardless of the outcome of the erection. To what degree depends on how much baiting the left continue to do.
    As far as the difference between Repubs and Demmies, with some there is no difference. If you look closely at Bush and Bozo, there is not that big of a variance in policies it seems.
    That is something we all need to be aware of.
    Its not so much R vs D, it is ideology that counts. Both sides have "progressives" and this is what people need to pay attention to. The progressive ideology is the real issue aside from lefty loonyism
    We saw what happened this last go around when people:
    A-Vote a party line
    B-Vote a color line


    Let us not make the same mistake twice just because a candidate has an R or is female.
    The most important thing to be learned from those who demand "Equality For All" is that all are not equal...

    Gun Control - seeking a Hardware solution for a Software problem...

  3. #23
    Iceman sniper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    16,987

    Default

    If he doesn't get elected again, there will be several lawsuits for race discrimination and they will probably get a settlement. hell, I think I will start writing one up now, use the proceeds for some new toys!
    All I have in this world is my balls and my word and I don't break em for no one.

    My Feedback

  4. #24
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I don't understand the thinking behind raising the taxes on the smallest percentage of the population.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Park County
    Posts
    204

    Default

    I blame McCain.

  6. #26
    CO-AR's Secret Jedi roberth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elk City, Oklahoma
    Posts
    10,501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    I don't understand the thinking behind raising the taxes on the smallest percentage of the population.
    I know what you mean. It is stupid and this why.

    The people who are on the receiving end of this tax increase are the very same people who create the jobs in the private sector. This plan is merely another 'redistribute the wealth from the producers to the parasites' plan.

    Private sector business has no incentive to expand, create jobs, or create products. They are being taxed and regulated at every turn and those aren't good incentives if you want a successful economy.

  7. #27
    Machine Gunner n8tive97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Westminster
    Posts
    1,291

    Default

    Worst president ever......

    I will be calling in sick either way. I will be hung over because we won or hung over because we lost.....
    My Feedback!

    NRA Member


  8. #28

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Irving View Post
    I don't understand the thinking behind raising the taxes on the smallest percentage of the population.
    That's easy, this is why they think it will help:

    Wealth Distribution - Total Net Worth in 2007

    Top 1 percent 34.6%
    Next 19 percent 50.5%
    Bottom 80 percent 15.0%


    The top 20% of america has 85% of the wealth. What they fail to see is that now our market is not national it is international, if you tax the top 1% or even the top 20% they will just move to another country and take their money with them.

  9. #29
    CO-AR's Secret Jedi roberth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elk City, Oklahoma
    Posts
    10,501

    Default

    Mobat555 - your stats are for people who think the rich should pay more and people who like class warfare Not everyone can be in the top 20%, the top 20% is for the folks whose skills and ambition surpass the average person.

    These are better stats from the National Taxpayers Union.

    http://ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html

    According to this data the top 25% of wage earners pay 86% of the income taxes collected, the bottom 50% pay less than 3% of the income taxes collected.

  10. #30

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by roberth View Post
    Mobat555 - your stats are for people who think the rich should pay more and people who like class warfare.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mobat555 View Post
    That's easy, this is why they think it will help.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •