The problem in, my eyes, is that justice and the law are seldom the same. Due process was followed in this case, and I think the jury made the right decision, based on the evidence they saw. All too often, the lawyers and investigators (on both sides) withhold evidence, skew facts, and outright lie, to achieve "victory", and justice falls by the wayside. Naive as it sounds, I'd rather see a prosecutor that had respect for the truth, and sought it out, rather than the one with the highest conviction rate.
Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...
Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?