Close
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 22
  1. #11
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Parker
    Posts
    672

    Default

    I closest experience I have is California law. The gun has to be in a locked container* and ammunition or loaded magazines can't be touching it. Basically it is inaccessable. That second part could be as simple as some padding in a pelican case or the pocket in a gun rug however we recommended to keep mags unloaded and ammo in a clearly separate area.

    I'm not 100% sure how that translates here but I figured going by a state with crazy tough laws it would be a good start and safe is better than sorry.

    *A locked container could be as simple as a luggage lock connecting the strings on a backpack zipper. That's what happens when gun laws are passed with no knowledge of how they work.
    The "k" is silent.

  2. #12
    Guest
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Fort Collins, Colorado
    Posts
    119

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by islandermyk View Post
    Now that is interesting...

    So many scenarios and questions to go with that... I think it'll be safer to get a CCW in this case... at least there won't be any bad ideas or questions if I have a CCW or not... and actually have to use the firearm...

    I think this might be off topic, but does the CCW mean concealment of any type of weapon(s)(knives, rifles, nun chucks, etc..)?
    Handgun only

  3. #13
    Beer Meister DFBrews's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    With the classyish Hipsters...Stapleton
    Posts
    3,175

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paladin View Post
    Handgun only
    there goes the underfolder in the backpack idea
    You sir, are a specialist in the art of discovering a welcoming outcome of a particular situation....not a mechanic.

    My feedback add 11-12 ish before the great servpocaylpse of 2012

  4. #14
    Fallen Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Smyrna, GA
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Paladin View Post
    Handgun only
    Quote Originally Posted by DFBrews View Post
    there goes the underfolder in the backpack idea


    PFFFT


    NOW how am I going to pedal my newly purchased Bazooka all of the way home?


  5. #15
    Beer Meister DFBrews's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    With the classyish Hipsters...Stapleton
    Posts
    3,175

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Byte Stryke View Post
    PFFFT


    NOW how am I going to pedal my newly purchased Bazooka all of the way home?

    Bowers probably has a paddle holster for it
    You sir, are a specialist in the art of discovering a welcoming outcome of a particular situation....not a mechanic.

    My feedback add 11-12 ish before the great servpocaylpse of 2012

  6. #16
    Zombie Slayer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    6,975

    Default Colorado Law

    The law states "on or about your person". Such law means stashed in your belt, hidden under a jacket, or even strapped to your ankle. The weapon is readily available for you to use. If it is difficult to get the firearm out of the backpack " it is not readily available! In otherwords, if you have to take the backpack off your back, unzip the backpack, take the container out of the backpack, and then remove the firearm from the container, it is LEGAL. If you can reach around , retrieve the firearm readily and have it in your hand it is ILLEGAL, unless you have a permit from the State of Colorado for concealed carry. See below for actual legislated law and court decisions:

    Title 18 Criminal Code (Colorado Revised Statutes)

    Article 12

    18-12-105

    1) A person commits a class 2 misdemeanor if such person knowingly and unlawfully:


    (a) Carries a knife concealed on or about his or her person; or

    (b) Carries a firearm concealed on or about his or her person; or

    (c) Without legal authority, carries, brings, or has in such person's possession a firearm or any explosive, incendiary, or other dangerous device on the property of or within any building in which the chambers, galleries, or offices of the general assembly, or either house thereof, are located, or in which a legislative hearing or meeting is being or is to be conducted, or in which the official office of any member, officer, or employee of the general assembly is located.

    (d) (Deleted by amendment, L. 93, p. 964, § 1, effective July 1, 1993.)

    (2) It shall not be an offense if the defendant was:

    (a) A person in his or her own dwelling or place of business or on property owned or under his or her control at the time of the act of carrying; or

    (b) A person in a private automobile or other private means of conveyance who carries a weapon for lawful protection of such person's or another's person or property while traveling; or

    (c) A person who, at the time of carrying a concealed weapon, held a valid written permit to carry a concealed weapon issued pursuant to section 18-12-105.1, as it existed prior to its repeal, or, if the weapon involved was a handgun, held a valid permit to carry a concealed handgun or a temporary emergency permit issued pursuant to part 2 of this article; except that it shall be an offense under this section if the person was carrying a concealed handgun in violation of the provisions of section 18-12-214; or

    (d) A peace officer, as described in section 16-2.5-101, C.R.S., when carrying a weapon in conformance with the policy of the employing agency as provided in section 16-2.5-101 (2), C.R.S.; or

    (e) (Deleted by amendment, L. 2003, p. 1624, § 46, effective August 6, 2003.)

    (f) A United States probation officer or a United States pretrial services officer while on duty and serving in the state of Colorado under the authority of rules and regulations promulgated by the judicial conference of the United States

    Recognition of § 13 of art. II, Colo. Const. Section 13 of art. II, Colo. Const., has limiting language dealing with defense of home, person, and property. These limitations have been recognized by the general assembly in the enactment of this section, which restricts the right to bear arms in certain circumstances, while permitting in other circumstances the carrying of a concealed weapon in defense of home, person, and property, and also when specifically authorized by written permit. People v. Blue, 190 Colo. 95, 544 P.2d 385 (1975).


    The words "about the person" means sufficiently close to the person to be readily accessible for immediate use. People in Interest of R.J.A., 38 Colo. App. 346, 556 P.2d 491 (1976).

    "Concealed" means placed out of sight so as not to be discernible or apparent by ordinary observation. People ex rel. O.R., 220 P.3d 949 (Colo. App. 2008).

    The scope of subsection (2)(b) is clarified in § 18-12-105.6, which indicates the general assembly's intent that local ordinances on carrying weapons in private vehicles be preempted only insofar as they conflict with the provisions of § 18-12-105.6. Trinen v. City & County of Denver, 53 P.3d 754 (Colo. App. 2002).

    The local ordinance concerning carrying a weapon in a private vehicle is not preempted since it can be harmonized with subsection (2)(b). Trinen v. City & County of Denver, 53 P.3d 754 (Colo. App. 2002).

    Pistol tucked under edge of car seat. Where uncontested evidence established that pistol was tucked under the edge of a car seat on which petitioner was sitting, where it was within his easy reach, these circumstances constitute carrying a "firearm concealed on or about his person". People in Interest of R.J.A., 38 Colo. App. 346, 556 P.2d 491 (1976).

    Question of whether weapon is concealed is question of fact for the jury which should not be summarily determined by the trial judge at the time that he rules on the defendant's motion to suppress. People v. Vincent, 628 P.2d 107 (Colo. 1981).

    Former subsection (2)(c) did not confer power to issue permits for carrying concealed weapons to police chiefs and sheriffs. Douglass v. Kelton, 199 Colo. 446, 610 P.2d 1067 (1980).

    Person receiving permit to carry concealed weapon cannot be convicted. Once a person receives a permit to carry a concealed weapon in a county or city, he may not be convicted under subsection (2)(c). Douglass v. Kelton, 199 Colo. 446, 610 P.2d 1067 (1980).

    Statute as basis for jurisdiction. See People v. Pickett, 194 Colo. 178, 571 P.2d 1078 (1977).

    Defendant could not be convicted of carrying a concealed weapon without the prosecution proving that defendant intended to use this short-bladed knife as a weapon. While the characteristics of an instrument may be an important factor in determining the intended purpose of an instrument, the language of the concealed weapons statute and established precedent establishes that a knife's design does not, by itself, prove that the person carrying it intended to use it as a weapon. A.P.E. v. People, 20 P.3d 1179 (Colo. 2001).

    Applied in People v. Velasquez, 641 P.2d 943 (Colo. 1982); People v. Deschamp, 662 P.2d 171 (Colo. 1983).
    Last edited by BushMasterBoy; 09-25-2011 at 00:14. Reason: formatting

  7. #17
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    The crime you commit by carrying without a permit is pretty low. However, I'm curious if you can EVER get a CCW after you've been busted for carrying without one. Any LEOs on here know?
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  8. #18
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Woodland Park
    Posts
    692

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Zundfolge View Post
    Since I have a concealed handgun license I guess its all a moot point for me. So go get your permit and don't worry
    I'd rather the law change so I can CC without government's nose in my bidnis. Then I don't have to worry. A la AK,AZ and VT.

  9. #19
    Varmiteer Seamonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Kiowa
    Posts
    501

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jumpstart View Post
    I'd rather the law change so I can CC without government's nose in my bidnis. Then I don't have to worry. A la AK,AZ and VT.
    Forgot WY
    Everyone wants to be a frogman on Friday
    You can't beat a woman who shoots - RW Swainson

  10. #20
    Zombie Slayer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    6,975

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jumpstart View Post
    I'd rather the law change so I can CC without government's nose in my bidnis. Then I don't have to worry. A la AK,AZ and VT.


    I'd vote in favor of that! Constitutional amendment is needed.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •