Close
Results 1 to 10 of 50

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    COAR's youngest old fart coop68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Erie, CO
    Posts
    1,272

    Default

    i'm in college so of course i have both BF3 and MWF3 pre-ordered!

    i too have been playing the BF3 beta when i can get in a game! server been pretty shitty and yes it has a lot of bugs! but its free!!!

    if any of you are on and want to play on xbox 360 gamer tag is coopoloop68

    P.S if you pre-ordered it with game stop they are having a ton of give away's in a sweepstakes online called pick your perks! cash, tricked out jeep, vortex bino's i looked them up worth around $500 bucks and radios and various things you can pick to try and win every week!

  2. #2
    Varmiteer CMP_5.56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Thornton, CO
    Posts
    508

    Default

    As long as MW3 has the same smooth fast multiplayer play as MW2, I'll be happy. BlavkOps was a hyge disapointment to me. I still play MW2, but the amount of hackers is starting to really piss me off.
    EMT-B

    Quote Originally Posted by Byte Stryke View Post
    Yeah, Leave it to our congress to be bipartisan when it comes to screwing the constitution.
    My Feedback

  3. #3
    Glock Armorer for sexual favors Jer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Loveland, CO
    Posts
    6,249

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CMP_5.56 View Post
    As long as MW3 has the same smooth fast multiplayer play as MW2, I'll be happy. BlavkOps was a hyge disapointment to me. I still play MW2, but the amount of hackers is starting to really piss me off.
    I don't know how you still play that game. I was the most anti-Treyarch person before Black Ops. Hell, I didn't even buy it until a month after it came out due to frustration on MW2. I hated to admit it but BO is MUCH better than MW2 and they fixed a LOT of the problems that MW2 had and still has. A few months after BO came out the servers went down one night for about an hour and I had a buddy over who I was trying to show my theater setup to. I took out BO and put MW2 in and I couldn't believe how ****ty that game was once I got use to BO. My very first game in I got a nuke and it reminded me how kill-streak dependent that game was. it was boring actually. Endless air support and with kill-streaks earning kill-streaks it really doesn't take much skill. The next game got hacked and I couldn't get a legit game after that and gave up. I did note how blurry the graphics looked and how muffled the audio was in comparison to BO as well. In all I'm glad I bit the bullet and made the jump to BO a year ago and have got plenty of miles out of my money. My only regret is not selling MW2 the day I bought BO.

    I should note that all of the above is multi-player. I actually preferred the campaign on MW2 a little more than BO but I feel as though BO had a better storyline. I only go through the campaign once on Veteran on each game before I switch completely to MP.

    My Xbox 360 gamertag is OstrichSaK

    If you send an invite include a note that you're from COAR15. I delete invites if I don't know who they're from.
    I'm not fat, I'm tactically padded.
    Tactical Commander - Fast Action Response Team (F.A.R.T.)
    For my feedback Click Here.
    Click: For anyone with a dog or pets, please read

  4. #4
    Varmiteer CMP_5.56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Thornton, CO
    Posts
    508

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jer View Post
    I don't know how you still play that game. I was the most anti-Treyarch person before Black Ops. Hell, I didn't even buy it until a month after it came out due to frustration on MW2. I hated to admit it but BO is MUCH better than MW2 and they fixed a LOT of the problems that MW2 had and still has. A few months after BO came out the servers went down one night for about an hour and I had a buddy over who I was trying to show my theater setup to. I took out BO and put MW2 in and I couldn't believe how ****ty that game was once I got use to BO. My very first game in I got a nuke and it reminded me how kill-streak dependent that game was. it was boring actually. Endless air support and with kill-streaks earning kill-streaks it really doesn't take much skill. The next game got hacked and I couldn't get a legit game after that and gave up. I did note how blurry the graphics looked and how muffled the audio was in comparison to BO as well. In all I'm glad I bit the bullet and made the jump to BO a year ago and have got plenty of miles out of my money. My only regret is not selling MW2 the day I bought BO.

    I should note that all of the above is multi-player. I actually preferred the campaign on MW2 a little more than BO but I feel as though BO had a better storyline. I only go through the campaign once on Veteran on each game before I switch completely to MP.

    My Xbox 360 gamertag is OstrichSaK

    If you send an invite include a note that you're from COAR15. I delete invites if I don't know who they're from.
    I bought BO the day it came out, I tried to play that game over and over and never could do it. I did like the fact that it took away the ability to use certain perks to make yourself seemingly invincible. From what I hear, MW3 is going to be MW2 style game play with BO type perks and what not. Also looks like killstreaks are either gone or greatly reduced. From the multiplayer preview, it looks like you get one secondary backup measure and that is it. In all honesty the only reason I still own BO is for zombies.

    I didn't notice MW2 being grainy at all. It looks amazing on the 50" HD tv. BO looks too cartoony for me. Which is kind of how I see the game play, cartoony. I hate to say it but i liked homefront more than BO.
    EMT-B

    Quote Originally Posted by Byte Stryke View Post
    Yeah, Leave it to our congress to be bipartisan when it comes to screwing the constitution.
    My Feedback

  5. #5
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CMP_5.56 View Post
    Also looks like killstreaks are either gone or greatly reduced. From the multiplayer preview, it looks like you get one secondary backup measure and that is it. In all honesty the only reason I still own BO is for zombies.

    I didn't notice MW2 being grainy at all. It looks amazing on the 50" HD tv. BO looks too cartoony for me. Which is kind of how I see the game play, cartoony. I hate to say it but i liked homefront more than BO.
    Hated BO, hated how they tried to make the purchase system- great idea, just falls short...
    MW3 will have different class based killstreaks, like assault and support and one other yet to be announced... should be pretty cool- assault has the predator strike, and AC130 type killstreak rewards whereas support will have UAV and Care packages.
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

  6. #6
    a cool, fancy title hollohas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Littleton
    Posts
    6,072

    Default

    I don't mind killstreaks. It's fun to get momentum and keep it rolling like a snowball.

    But here's an honest question for you military types or those that appreciate added realism in a game.

    Aren't killstreaks a bit backwards? By that I mean shouldn't things like mortar team support and AC130 gunships be given to a guy that's getting his ass kicked? Not someone who's not dying and doing just fine killing peeps with his M4?

    I'm mean realistically, and correct me if I'm wrong, but I would think that on a real battlefield if your infantry is doing just fine on the ground with their small arms, would they call in close air support? Or do they call in support when they are pinned down and losing the fight?

    I know, I know, games aren't real and in games they "reward" you for things like not dying. And why give people that suck and die a lot an advantage. But that would really even things out if you got an AC130 for a 10 death streak or something. I mean it sucks when I have 25 or 30 kills with 10 deaths but still lose because some guy on my team went 5 and 25.

  7. #7
    Cool Guy Title airborneranger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Leavenworth, KS
    Posts
    1,011

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hollohas View Post
    I'm mean realistically, and correct me if I'm wrong, but I would think that on a real battlefield if your infantry is doing just fine on the ground with their small arms, would they call in close air support? Or do they call in support when they are pinned down and losing the fight?
    If you got it, call it in. No sense in shooting somebody with an M4 if you can pound him with mortars or air support.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •