Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. #1
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default Hollywood ruining yet another classic

    Oh FFS! Hollyweird continues to ruin great classics with horrible writing and an overdependent need for gratuitous CGI effects! Anyone who's seen the original will know how great the story and message is...
    The geniuses in LALA land are remaking the Japanese classic "47 Ronin." Changing the story, adding in supernatural BS, and starring Keanu freaking Reeves! Are you joking!?
    The original plot is based on the actual 18th Century events (also described in the DeNiro flick "Ronin"):
    Lord Asano resists a bribery attempt by a member of the Shogun's court. His honesty, however, is useless against the corruption of the administration, and he is forced to commit harakiri (ritualistic suicide). His samurai followers are dispersed as masterless ronin. The leader of the samurai, Oichi, plots with a loyal band of ronin to seek revenge for their master's dishonor.
    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0033654/?ref_=sr_2

    But now, the remake involves supernatural BS, witches, and other ridiculous, over the top, CGI dependent stuff that strays so far from the original that the only thing the two have in common is the number of masterless samurai featured.
    Here's the silly trailer:

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1335975/?ref_=sr_1

    This will end up just as bad as Star Wars prequels, and the shoddy attempt to reboot the Indiana Jones franchise!
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

  2. #2
    Hatchet Sushi Master Rooskibar03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vail, AZ
    Posts
    2,770

    Default

    Does Keanue Reeves have more than one voice?
    Progressive ideology, ideas so good they must be mandatory.
    Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.

  3. #3
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rooskibar03 View Post
    Does Keanue Reeves have more than one voice?
    It would seem he plays the same character in every movie: either a robot, an alien, surfer, or a robot-alien-surfer... His most compelling role to date was "The Day The Earth Stood Still"- but in that he wasn't really acting.
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

  4. #4
    Zombie Slayer Zundfolge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Wichita, KS (formerly COS)
    Posts
    8,317

    Default

    There are approximately 100,000 new novels published each year (source) and another approximately 100,000 new screenplays written each year (source).

    There are enough new stories to be told that the entire concept of the "remake" should be completely foreign to us. There are maybe, maybe, a dozen movies ever made that should be "remade" because of changes in film technology that allow them to better tell the story.

    Otherwise, we should be inundated with fresh, new, original stories on the silver screen every year.


    Hollywood really needs to be allowed to die off.
    Modern liberalism is based on the idea that reality is obligated to conform to one's beliefs because; "I have the right to believe whatever I want".

    "Everything the State says is a lie, and everything it has it has stolen.
    -Friedrich Nietzsche

    "Every time something really bad happens, people cry out for safety, and the government answers by taking rights away from good people."
    -Penn Jillette

    A World Without Guns <- Great Read!

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Larimer County
    Posts
    1,580
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    So by your reasoning the movie 300 was a waste of time for everyone as well? How many people continued to learn about the Greeks after watching the CGI effects in that movie?

  6. #6
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by coloccw View Post
    So by your reasoning the movie 300 was a waste of time for everyone as well? How many people continued to learn about the Greeks after watching the CGI effects in that movie?
    Technically 300 wasn't a remake of "The 300 Spartans." So you cannot compare the two. 300 was a film adaptation of a Frank Miller graphic novel, loosely based on the battle of Thermopylae.
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

  7. #7
    Witness Protection Reject rondog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Parker, CO
    Posts
    8,292
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
    It would seem he plays the same character in every movie: either a robot, an alien, surfer, or a robot-alien-surfer... His most compelling role to date was "The Day The Earth Stood Still"- but in that he wasn't really acting.
    I thought he did great in "A Walk In The Clouds". But that was in '95.
    There's a lot more of us ugly mf'ers out here than there are of you pretty people!

    - Frank Zappa

    Scrotum Diem - bag the day!

    It's all shits and giggles until someone giggles and shits.....

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Larimer County
    Posts
    1,580
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
    Oh FFS! Hollyweird continues to ruin great classics with horrible writing and an overdependent need for gratuitous CGI effects! Anyone who's seen the original will know how great the story and message is...


    But now, the remake involves supernatural BS, witches, and other ridiculous, over the top, CGI dependent stuff that strays so far from the original that the only thing the two have in common is the number of Spartans featured.
    So...what's the difference?

  9. #9
    BADGE BUNNY Monky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Englehood
    Posts
    5,447

    Default Hollywood ruining yet another classic

    Man I should get upset any time someone makes a new planet of the apes...

    I guess the Japanese don't believe in any supernatural... Oh wait... They do


    Sent by a free-range electronic weasel, with no sense of personal space.
    Last edited by Monky; 07-25-2013 at 12:33.

  10. #10
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by coloccw View Post
    So...what's the difference?
    See this:
    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
    Technically 300 wasn't a remake of "The 300 Spartans." So you cannot compare the two. 300 was a film adaptation of a Frank Miller graphic novel, loosely based on the battle of Thermopylae.
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •