Assumptions with regards to what others will take from such open ended and EXCEPTIONALLY VAGUE questions such as you posted is not the best of tacts to utilize on the Internet.

Yes we can surmise that it was you wished to discuss, but I'll tell you this... I could have easily assumed that you believed that child molesters and wife beaters should have their "rights" restored, or that you believed that the BATFE should have the ability to constantly harass FFL holders when ever they want.

I would have expected that you might have learned to be more specific around here from your past attempts at initiating debate. I'm not saying this isn't a good subject to discusss, just pick a part of it to discuss when you initiate the conversation.

As for that specific portion of the Act.. I don't disagree with it. I don't like the way it snuck through, but the politics of the day (before you were born if I make my guess) were different than today.