National CCW reciprocity bill clears House panel

[DD977GM2]

19-11 vote to go onto the Senate by end of 2011. This would be ****ing awesome
if this passes and my CCW permit is valid in California since I have family there
and love the ocean. I would really enjoy going to all these non gun friendly states
with the ability to defend myself and my family

House panel clears conceal-and-carry gun bill, with one Republican defection

[Monky]

your link she is broken!

[ghettodub]

nice to hear! I know RMGO and NAGR were against this, but I'm for it

[DD977GM2]

nice to hear! I know RMGO and NAGR were against this, but I'm for it

Why would they be against it? RMGO doesnt surpise me since his association with ****smoke.


Also, link is fixed

[ChunkyMonkey]

Why would they be against it?


Also, link is fixed

I am against anything that transfer power from the State to the Federal govt. This law will allow the fed to ban someone from carrying nationwide, will it not?

[DD977GM2]

I am against anything that transfer power from the State to the Federal govt. This law will allow the fed to ban someone from carrying nationwide, will it not?

I can agree with you.

Then they should treat it like drivers license. Making it legal to CCW in any state
that have permits etc. The feds dont control the DL and who can and cant have one do they? (serious question not being sarcastic)

[ghettodub]

I can agree with you.

Then they should treat it like drivers license. Making it legal to CCW in any state
that have permits etc. The feds dont control the DL and who can and cant have one do they? (serious question not being sarcastic)

Good question and point.

There's one thing on this link that I think covers that, but I'm not sure

http://www.nraila.org/Issues/FactShe...=189&issue=003

Myth: H.R. 822 would involve the federal bureaucracy in setting standards for carry permits, resulting in "need" requirements, higher fees, waiting periods, national gun owner registration, or worse.

FACT: H.R. 822 doesn't require -- or even authorize -- any such action by any federal agency. In fact, since it would amend the Gun Control Act, it would fall under a limitation within that law that authorizes "only such rules and regulations as are necessary to carry out" the GCA's provisions. No federal rules or regulations would be needed to implement H.R. 822, which simply overrides certain state laws.

[glockedandloaded]

I am against anything that transfer power from the State to the Federal govt. This law will allow the fed to ban someone from carrying nationwide, will it not?

exactly. this is a Trojan horse. WTF are we thinking its a good thing to give hte feds more power?

[roberth]

I am against anything that transfer power from the State to the Federal govt. This law will allow the fed to ban someone from carrying nationwide, will it not?

Me too.

This is just another violation of the 2nd amendment in a different way. We shouldn't need any 'crat to declare us eligible for concealed carry, open carry, NFA. All we need are the locals to vet us for felonies.

[Jer]

Me too.

This is just another violation of the 2nd amendment in a different way. We shouldn't need any 'crat to declare us eligible for concealed carry, open carry, NFA. All we need are the locals to vet us for felonies.

Yeah, I agree. We shouldn't need it but the sad fact is we do. Just like we shouldn't need to fight for our 2nd amendment rights but if we don't, who will?