Quote Originally Posted by mevshooter View Post
Come on, man, take the 5 minutes and find the articles to back up what you're saying. I did it for mine, and when/if you do find them, it only strengthens your stance.

And saying something like "I don't care enough about this to take the time out to do it" is crap because if you're taking the time to respond with some decently lengthy posts in the first place, you obviously care enough about the subject matter.

Not saying you feel that way or were going to comment in such a manner, just preemptively shooting that idea down for anyone else who wants to say things like "I recall seeing that article" or "in fact, I remember that article" without actually posting any links or references.
What a pain in the ass. Keywords for 'death of a president', 'secret service', etc, either pull up stuff about that film or information regarding the Kennedy assassination.

Anyway, I did find this after a few searches:

"I couldn't convince him we were just shooting a movie. I even got a call from the real Secret Service, who wanted to know what we were doing. They wanted to confirm that we were indeed just shooting a movie," Range says.
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-1390398.html

I'm not going to sign up for service to 'Highbeam' or pay for Chicago Sun-Times archives go get a real copy of this article, but I doubt people are sitting around in a room somewhere fabricating false articles in order to get people to pay for archives.

At the same time, the lack of available articles regarding an investigation or the director's quote does provide some ammunition towards the media-bias argument.