Could 2012 be America's last election

[KevDen2005]

or it's already too late...good luck...

[Zundfolge]

...ANYONE but Obama... seriously, I think a mentally handicapped llama would do a better job...

Dunno why but that instantly made me think of this:

[stevelkinevil]

Comrade, we have a choice this election, how delightful!! LMAO

We could almost apply that to this upcoming election.

Common folks get real, this is already what we have. Romney is just a socialist with an R next to his name. 6 of one 1/2 dozen of the other when you get down to it. But if you insist on wearing blinders, sure Mittens is ever so slightly better than Obeyme, ever so slightly.

[SAnd]

The liberals have been working from at least the mid '90s to have people in place to control the results of the votes. I'll quote Uncle Joe again-

"You know, comrades," says Stalin, "that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this - who will count the votes, and how."

The libs control most of the vote counters or the people that rule on the votes.

I don't expect to see another election if obama 'wins' the coming election.

Less than 20% of the popiulation participated in the first American Revolution. I don't think that many people will be enough this time.

[Jer]

Common folks get real, this is already what we have. Romney is just a socialist with an R next to his name. 6 of one 1/2 dozen of the other when you get down to it. But if you insist on wearing blinders, sure Mittens is ever so slightly better than Obeyme, ever so slightly.

Exactly. I have a hard time taking anyone serious who says Obama is the anti-christ while simultaneously supporting Mittens. Same person, different name.

[BPTactical]

Exactly. I have a hard time taking anyone serious who says Obama is the anti-christ while simultaneously supporting Mittens. Same person, different name.

But-and it is a big but, I really feel that although Romney may be Obama lite he still has the best interest of America at heart.
It is very evident by the actions shown the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania does not.
That's a start.
I also do not feel we would get the level of dishonesty that we do now. At least we know something about Mittens, his background and his leadership experience.
Helluva lot more than we can say for "Americas First Gay President"........

[roberth]

Exactly. I have a hard time taking anyone serious who says Obama is the anti-christ while simultaneously supporting Mittens. Same person, different name.

But-and it is a big but, I really feel that although Romney may be Obama lite he still has the best interest of America at heart.
It is very evident by the actions shown the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania does not.
That's a start.
I also do not feel we would get the level of dishonesty that we do now. At least we know something about Mittens, his background and his leadership experience.
Helluva lot more than we can say for "Americas First Gay President"........

In addition.

Do you think Mitt would do or allow the things I listed to happen under his administration? I do not.

[sniper7]

Somebody is watching us.



Gotta run I think I hear a chopper,,,

saw 3 of the damn things right over my house yesterday. one guy in the blackhawk even pointed at me while hitting the guy next to him in the arm. I dove in the bushes!

[Jer]

But-and it is a big but, I really feel that although Romney may be Obama lite he still has the best interest of America at heart.
It is very evident by the actions shown the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania does not.
That's a start.
I also do not feel we would get the level of dishonesty that we do now. At least we know something about Mittens, his background and his leadership experience.
Helluva lot more than we can say for "Americas First Gay President"........

In addition.

Do you think Mitt would do or allow the things I listed to happen under his administration? I do not.

This is where I get frustrated. When people talk about Ron Paul potentially being president all you hear is that he won't be able to get anything done because the president has no real power. Then, when people talk about Obama he has the power to turn the country into a socialistic nation and undo everything that's been done since the country was created. He has that power mind you even though he's working against a Republican house. Then, when people consider Mittens Romney he suddenly can do no wrong even though he has the backing of a Republican house. Okay. This all makes sense.

Face it, the ONLY option to not further destroy this country with political business as usual just announced he is no longer actively campaigning in states that haven't yet voted. We continue to elect politicians that are in the pockets of big business and have ZERO concern for the people (other than re-election) and we keep getting what we deserve. Bush fucked us. Obama fucked us. Romney will just be more of the same. You people need to realize it's no longer D v R but Us v Them because they sure have and so far they're WAY ahead in the score building an insurmountable lead heading toward the end of the game. As long as we're focused on fighting over what the batting order is they're hitting homerun after homerun. They invented the game they're playing and nobody on our side even cares to learn the rules of the game.

[BPTactical]

But until we can get an "us" candidate elected we have to make the best choice of what is available.
As somebody stated pre crash, this upcoming erection is like choosing which STD you want.
Obumbler is AIDs, a death sentence.
Romney, the clap, maybe herpes. Annoying as hell but not deadly if kept in check.