Glock manual safety

[Slapps74]

I ran across this while looking around on the Internet for Glock pictures. Wondering if anyone has one and if so what is your opinion. I was thinking of putting one on my G29 just not sure if I want to modify the frame of the gun.

http://cominolli.com/product_info.php?products_id=29

[BPTactical]

If Glock would have wanted a manual safety on their pistol they would have designed it as such.
A hardware fix for a software problem.

[Great-Kazoo]

Glocks come with a safety, it's called finger off trigger.
Installing a manual safety is a solution for a non existent problem.

[Hoser]

Run away.

[bobbyfairbanks]

I think you should get and then test it. Once you realize it sucks we can all make fun of you.

[BuffCyclist]

A hardware fix for a software problem.

This is the best answer.

[10x]

Wow at $90 that is too expensive, anyway.

[Scanker19]

Glocks have 3 safeties. They should all be trusted as much as an external one. A safety is a mechanical device that CAN fail. How many people have been shot with guns that had the safety "on", or "Unloaded" guns?

[rustycrusty]

lol- unanimous 'no' and yet these gizmos still sell like crazy...

go for it I guess- if you don't like it you can always sell the gun for $600 to some gunshow idiot. glock for retards!

[spqrzilla]

I'm not a Glock fanboy myself. But on modern guns, I don't believe in aftermarket gizmos that affect trigger geometry or safety behavior on guns manufactured by people other than the engineers that built it originally.

On something like a 1911, that people have been studying for a century, its different. Its well understood how they work in terms of engineering, but on the new stuff - I saw if the manufacturer does not back it don't buy it.