For those who believe the 'Voting for the Lesser of Two Evils' idea & lovers of freedom everywhere

[mike9905]

Our next President will likely appoint three Supreme Court justices. Does anyone want them appointed by Obama?

[stevelkinevil]

...I urge you to read this short article that is very well written and conveys what I've been saying for years. I still don't understand how anyone can think that voting for the 'lesser of two evils' is somehow helping our nation.

Very nice brother! Unfortunately our cries mostly fall on deaf ears, hard to punch through designed tradition.

[MED]

Our next President will likely appoint three Supreme Court justices. Does anyone want them appointed by Obama?

The thought of any more appointments by the big O, necessitates the need to run outside and vomit!

[Bailey Guns]

I'm so tired of the "lesser of two evils" false dilemma. Once you start with that you've lost me because it just doesn't hold water.

I've grown tired of arguing the fallacy of a 3rd party solving our problems that I just refuse to play any longer.

Vote how you like. I'm voting for Romney. You may think it's foolish or stupid or whatever. I guarantee you I think your decision to vote 3rd party is just as foolish or stupid. Actually, probably more so.

I've just come to the conclusion that we're going to disagree.

[cstone]

Very nice brother! Unfortunately our cries mostly fall on deaf ears, hard to punch through designed tradition.

I consider myself a traditionalist. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tradition

Thank you.

[Bailey Guns]

Our next President will likely appoint three Supreme Court justices. Does anyone want them appointed by Obama?

That point alone is enough to convince me to vote for Romney.

[Sharpienads]

Very nice brother! Unfortunately our cries mostly fall on deaf ears, hard to punch through designed tradition.

I can't speak for everybody, but just because people disagree with you doesn't mean it falls on deaf ears.

[cstone]

I've just come to the conclusion that we're going to disagree.

Who wants to live in a world where everyone agrees? Not I.

Vive la différence!

[MED]

I'm so tired of the "lesser of two evils" false dilemma. Once you start with that you've lost me because it just doesn't hold water.

I've grown tired of arguing the fallacy of a 3rd party solving our problems that I just refuse to play any longer.

Vote how you like. I'm voting for Romney. You may think it's foolish or stupid or whatever. I guarantee you I think your decision to vote 3rd party is just as foolish or stupid. Actually, probably more so.

I've just come to the conclusion that we're going to disagree.

I don't think people understand the population. Based on the demographics of this country, there is no way to get a president elected without majority support from the moderates of both parties and a majority of the independents. If the third party doesn't appeal to these people, then the candidate will not be elected. I am never going to agree with these people either, but I would rather join forces with them than see a socialist win. The only solution of complete disappointment is a decentralized
government where regional policy is dominant, but that is a clock that can't be turned back.

[Bailey Guns]

Not to mention that because you believe in something with all your heart doesn't necessarily make your viewpoint right.