For those who believe the 'Voting for the Lesser of Two Evils' idea & lovers of freedom everywhere

[gcrookston]

Yeah...and the "Romney=Obama Lite" line is not only getting tiresome...it's a sure sign the person spouting the platitude is ridiculously ill-informed on the issues, history of the candidates and current events.

I'm well aware of the history of accomplishments of the candidate as a venture capitalist and Governor and recognize what he and people like him have done to the detriment of the US economy resulting in the last 5 years' recession.

I'm hard pressed to find any differences in the current positions between the candidates other than their party affiliations. They disgust me.

[Bailey Guns]

I'm hard pressed to find any differences in the current positions between the candidates other than their party affiliations. They disgust me.

Wow... Really? Do you read anything? Ever watch the news?

If there's no difference in their positions why aren't hard-core leftists or even slightly left-of-center democrats saying, "Huh...I just can't decide. The positions that Romney and Obama take on all the issues are so strikingly similar that I just can't tell the difference between their positions. I'll just flip a coin on who to vote for."

And what's wrong with venture capitalists?

[Jer]

Don't state it as fact unless you can provide some proof.

I presented proof & half the people here don't even bother reading the link posted before submitting their dos centavos (might as well get used to speaking Spanish now) on the topic. Within that link is a video comparing SCOTUS to Mittens. They're not all that different.

I don't know why I tried. I love how someone was so hell bent on Republican being the only way that he mentioned years the Democratic presidents were elected as if we had had Republicans instead for the last two decades everything would be just fine. Yeah, ok. Because Gee Dub didn't do any damage at all.

I don't know why I bother when most people aren't even going to read they're so programmed to lash out against anyone who dares challenge the system.

[tmckay2]

Don't state it as fact unless you can provide some proof.

is that a joke? how about his entire record? is that enough proof? i mean this isn't rocket science. liberal is as liberal does.

[tmckay2]

I presented proof & half the people here don't even bother reading the link posted before submitting their dos centavos (might as well get used to speaking Spanish now) on the topic. Within that link is a video comparing SCOTUS to Mittens. They're not all that different.

I don't know why I tried. I love how someone was so hell bent on Republican being the only way that he mentioned years the Democratic presidents were elected as if we had had Republicans instead for the last two decades everything would be just fine. Yeah, ok. Because Gee Dub didn't do any damage at all.

I don't know why I bother when most people aren't even going to read they're so programmed to lash out against anyone who dares challenge the system.

if it was realistic for someone else to beat the system i think most of us would be all for it. the point is that our future is mostly decided for us. if you think the people vote in a president you are incredibly naive. we get two candidates basically chosen for us, usually bad ones. people grow up thinking we the people have power and can change things but in reality, with the current system, thats false. its a rigged game.

[Bailey Guns]

You didn't provide proof or anything close to proof. You provided a link to an opinion piece on a blog. A link to an opinion that validated your own opinions.

Obviously you're welcome to your own opinions. But trying to pass off that link as proof of anything other than there's someone else out there that shares you viewpoint is not gonna fly.

Furthermore, who's lashed out at anyone in this thread?

[Jer]

I'm with you Jer but you're not going to change any opinions around here.

I understand the thinking behind voting for Romney to oust Obama if you think that Romney is truly going to be an improvement over Obama but I think they're functionally going to be one in the same. Less freedom, more spending, and no improvement.

Very nice brother! Unfortunately our cries mostly fall on deaf ears, hard to punch through designed tradition.

One day I'll learn to just bite my tongue & accept the fate chose for me by the majority. It amazes me how many people subscribe to the theory: If it ain't working just keep doing it the same way & it's bound to get better eventually. Heaven forbid someone attempt to buck business as usual with something as simple and safe as a vote. I'm supposed to believe these same people who are afraid of the outcome of a presidential election will take up arms for what is right the way they claim on internet forums? Yeah. Right.

[Bailey Guns]

is that a joke? how about his entire record? is that enough proof? i mean this isn't rocket science. liberal is as liberal does.

Well that's pretty definitive...

[Jer]

You didn't provide proof or anything close to proof. You provided a link to an opinion piece on a blog. A link to an opinion that validated your own opinions.

Obviously you're welcome to your own opinions. But trying to pass off that link as proof of anything other than there's someone else out there that shares you viewpoint is not gonna fly.

Furthermore, who's lashed out at anyone in this thread?

Again, the proof wasn't the link. But had you clicked the link & actually read the article you would have seen a video comparing the two. Thanks for taking the time to read before jumping into the conversation though.

[Bailey Guns]

In another thread I posted numerous, substantial differences in policy positions between Romney and Obama. Verifiable differences.

Why can't you do the same to prove there is little or no difference between the two. "His entire record" ain't gonna fly, either.