Close
Results 1 to 10 of 160

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Castle Rock
    Posts
    3,254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KevDen2005 View Post
    Just because someone doesn't make a phone call doesn't mean police contact results in only a consensual contact. If police can articulate a reasonable suspicion ton contact a person they don't need consent. Often times I will also ask for consent so I can articulate in my report later that there were circumstances that allowed me to contact this person AND I got consent.
    That's kinda what I was thinking; even if the law says that LEO can't stop someone solely for OC, if the LEO really wants to stop you, they could wait until they could justify "reasonable suspicion" or until maybe you "jaywalked".

    So maybe I am missing something and sorry if it's spelled out "between the lines", but if a call came in and you had to respond (to the OC guy) would you have to initiate contact by law? Or is it up to you at that point?

    Thanks!

  2. #2
    Recognized as needing a lap dance
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SW Missouri
    Posts
    5,540

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 10mm-man View Post
    That's kinda what I was thinking; even if the law says that LEO can't stop someone solely for OC, if the LEO really wants to stop you, they could wait until they could justify "reasonable suspicion" or until maybe you "jaywalked".

    So maybe I am missing something and sorry if it's spelled out "between the lines", but if a call came in and you had to respond (to the OC guy) would you have to initiate contact by law? Or is it up to you at that point?

    Thanks!
    Generally yes I would need to contact him, but this goes back to what I was saying about information provided. What did the caller say? What did dispatch tell you?

  3. #3
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Castle Rock
    Posts
    3,254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KevDen2005 View Post
    Generally yes I would need to contact him, but this goes back to what I was saying about information provided. What did the caller say? What did dispatch tell you?
    Gotcha! Thanks..........

  4. #4
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by KevDen2005 View Post
    Generally yes I would need to contact him, but this goes back to what I was saying about information provided. What did the caller say? What did dispatch tell you?
    This kinda goes back to what was said earlier, sometimes it seems that it's beyond an officer's control and the blame somewhat lies with the dispatcher- it should be SOP to determine the context of any suspicion or threat:
    Caller: "There is a man with a gun on the sidewalk."
    Dispatcher: "What is he doing with the gun?"
    C: "Nothing, it's in a holster."
    D: "Is he threatening anyone or presenting a danger to the public?"
    C: "No, he's just walking, but that gun is a danger to the public!"
    D: "Calm down, he's well within his rights and seems to be just minding his own business, it's fine that he has a gun and he is being responsible, nothing to worry about. Have a nice day." click!
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

  5. #5
    Rebuilt from Salvage TFOGGER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    7,784

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
    This kinda goes back to what was said earlier, sometimes it seems that it's beyond an officer's control and the blame somewhat lies with the dispatcher- it should be SOP to determine the context of any suspicion or threat:
    Caller: "There is a man with a gun on the sidewalk."
    Dispatcher: "What is he doing with the gun?"
    C: "Nothing, it's in a holster."
    D: "Is he threatening anyone or presenting a danger to the public?"
    C: "No, he's just walking, but that gun is a danger to the public!"
    D: "Calm down, he's well within his rights and seems to be just minding his own business, it's fine that he has a gun and he is being responsible, nothing to worry about. Have a nice day." click!
    Never happen. Dispatch isn't there to decide if a call is worth responding to. That is how lawsuits are formulated. The best they can do is to pass the info along to the responding officers, who can make an assessment on the scene about what action (if any) to take.
    Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...

    Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
    ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?

  6. #6
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TFOGGER View Post
    Never happen. Dispatch isn't there to decide if a call is worth responding to. That is how lawsuits are formulated. The best they can do is to pass the info along to the responding officers, who can make an assessment on the scene about what action (if any) to take.
    Ah you're right... I guess in a more perfect world the call wouldn't even occur...
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

  7. #7
    MODFATHER cstone's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Baltimore, MD
    Posts
    7,472

    Default



    This video is a little long, but it gives some examples of the types of contact officers make all over the country with all types of people.

    The issue doesn't have to be "open carry."

    Some people want contact with LE. Some people only post the bad contact they have with officers because it fits their agenda. Some people (like the last contact in the video) actually post the good contact. There are other videos available on the Internet documenting good contact. I wish there was more. Both the good and the bad videos make good training aids for officers.

    Their are hundreds of thousands of laws and millions of citizens dealing with tens of thousands of LEOs. Math makes my head hurt, and probability of getting everything right given the numbers of variables just makes me happy when everyone walks away without any serious injury.

    IMO, the greatest violation of Constitutional rights is to unlawfully deprive a citizen of their life.

    Be safe.
    Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.

    My Feedback

  8. #8
    Sig Fantastic Ronin13's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Arvada, CO
    Posts
    10,268

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cstone View Post


    This video is a little long, but it gives some examples of the types of contact officers make all over the country with all types of people.

    The issue doesn't have to be "open carry."

    Some people want contact with LE. Some people only post the bad contact they have with officers because it fits their agenda. Some people (like the last contact in the video) actually post the good contact. There are other videos available on the Internet documenting good contact. I wish there was more. Both the good and the bad videos make good training aids for officers.

    Their are hundreds of thousands of laws and millions of citizens dealing with tens of thousands of LEOs. Math makes my head hurt, and probability of getting everything right given the numbers of variables just makes me happy when everyone walks away without any serious injury.

    IMO, the greatest violation of Constitutional rights is to unlawfully deprive a citizen of their life.

    Be safe.
    I will say this, they were trying to progress their agenda but some of those cops were a little difficult to deal with. I'm just upset that they're trying to push their "9/11 Truth" BS and that they're from Denver. But the last Deputy was awesome.
    "There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
    "The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."

  9. #9
    A FUN TITLE asmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Douglas County (Parker)
    Posts
    3,446

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cstone View Post
    Absolutely BRAVO to the last officer. Perfect handling of the situation. As the Israelis figured out a while back, sometimes its just better to talk with people than to come out swinging.
    What is my joy if all hands, even the unclean, can reach into it? What is my wisdom, if even the fools can dictate to me? What is my freedom, if all creatures, even the botched and impotent, are my masters? What is my life, if I am but to bow, to agree and to obey?
    -- Ayn Rand, Anthem (Chapter 11)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •