Heard about this the day it happened. They had someone from the Brady side saying that they are extremely nervous that the SC will take the case because of the conservative slat in the SC right now.

The question that would have to be answered is: is the 2nd speaking exclusively to members of a "Well Regulated" militia and/or the private citizen.

That is a question the pro and anti-gun organizations have been wanting the SC to address for 3 decades now. They have to date avoided taking cases that would force them to answer it.

This is going to be fun, should the SC uphold the FAC's decision, there could not legally any restrictions on the type of weapons owned by the person or (if they deem it only militia's) militia's.

Watch out folks, this is the one that will end the debate for a long while to come, one way or another. We'll have States Rights issues either way it turns out.