I wasn't making the point that RWD handles better,(that is another whole argument) just that departments were NOT asking for it... AWD is more complicated for sure. I doubt maintenance will be the same on a twin turbo awd...
Where are the specs? That was my snarky comment on Ford's website-all marketing fluff... there are some features, but no hard performance data
I'd love to see a unbiased shoot-out with all the police packages in a set of races, at least some with real officers behind the wheel for subjective "feel"
Please stop comparing it to the crown-vic... that was an outdated, pig of a design(and no longer available, so a moot point)- the Charger trounced it, and that's probably why Ford got off their ass and came up with a new interceptor- they got lazy until somebody made something that competed in the fleet market.
the SHO doesn't get all rave reviews: http://www.wired.com/reviews/2012/06/taurus-sho/
everyone I know that has the F150 with Eco-Boost is wondering where the mpg rating comes from- they all fall VERY short of the rating I wonder if Ford tuned the computer to look for the EPA test.




Reply With Quote
Obviously AWD handles better than RWD and I believe (mainly because I've lived in Jeffco almost my entire life) they realize that JCR&B isn't the best at plowing snow (mostly my opinion though) and you don't want your LEOs bogged down because of a storm. And you're right, the Crown Vic is outdated, was one of the better interceptors in it's hayday but now it's really showing it's age. I think CSP made a wise choice using the upgraded Chargers though, hate on them all you want for being a 4-door, they do make pretty good LE cars with the police package- at least that's what a family friend of ours on CSP said, he likes them.
I'm probably one of the only people on earth who actually likes the new Charger, granted it's not true to the original, but now a days almost every single re-release of older cars isn't true to the original -see Chevy Malibu :O

