Close
Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 123456 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 51

Thread: Media issues

  1. #21
    Grand Master Know It All trlcavscout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Milliken
    Posts
    3,081

    Default

    Never trust a man that wears makeup! I watched a few different ones today and heard the usual "assault weapon", "machine gun" etc etc... Mudder humper listened to too many fitty cent songs, damn man all guns arent "Glock 40's" and "machine guns". And AR-15's arent what I carried in the Army either mudder trucker!!! Douche bags cant even get the numbers right, if you dont fricken know, dont say it.

  2. #22
    Mr Yamaha brutal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Unincorporated Douglas County, CO
    Posts
    13,962

    Default

    Just overhead on KUSA, "...many of these weapons are easily converted to fully-automatic." really? On whose authority did they get this bit of misinformation?

    On another note, overheard on a flight home this morning (been up since 0300 EST so I'm tired and cranky anyway), "There's no reason anyone should ever be allowed to own an assault weapon or handgun." We all know there are so many issues with that statement - our rights, bad guys, simple logic, etc.

    This same libtard decided it was OK to endanger a whole airplane full of people by taking video/pictures out the window on approach with his Chinese iPad knockoff tablet. Yes, I know the Mythbusters proved no harm, no foul on phones, but HE was breaking the laws put in place by the FAA to protect the flying public and rules by the airline because they can't possibly test all this odd crap.

    They just don't see the hypocrisy of their words and actions. Had this event not just unfolded, he would have gotten an earful on both accounts.
    My Feedback
    Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
    Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
    Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."

  3. #23
    Iceman sniper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    16,987

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brutal View Post
    Just overhead on KUSA, "...many of these weapons are easily converted to fully-automatic." really? On whose authority did they get this bit of misinformation?

    On another note, overheard on a flight home this morning (been up since 0300 EST so I'm tired and cranky anyway), "There's no reason anyone should ever be allowed to own an assault weapon or handgun." We all know there are so many issues with that statement - our rights, bad guys, simple logic, etc.

    This same libtard decided it was OK to endanger a whole airplane full of people by taking video/pictures out the window on approach with his Chinese iPad knockoff tablet. Yes, I know the Mythbusters proved no harm, no foul on phones, but HE was breaking the laws put in place by the FAA to protect the flying public and rules by the airline because they can't possibly test all this odd crap.

    They just don't see the hypocrisy of their words and actions. Had this event not just unfolded, he would have gotten an earful on both accounts.
    You should have turned him in
    All I have in this world is my balls and my word and I don't break em for no one.

    My Feedback

  4. #24
    Rebuilt from Salvage TFOGGER's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    7,789

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by waxthis View Post
    "Definitions

    A genuine assault weapon, as opposed to a legal definition, is a hand-held, selective fire weapon, which means it's capable of firing in either an automatic or a semiautomatic mode depending on the position of a selector switch. These kinds of weapons are heavily regulated by the National Firearms Act of 1934 and are further regulated in some states. (See machine guns.)

    However, current "assault weapon" legislation defines certain semi-automatic weapons as "assault weapons." A semi-automatic weapon is one that fires a round with each pull of the trigger, versus an automatic weapon which continues to shoot until the trigger is released or the ammunition supply is exhausted. These kinds of "assault weapons" are sometimes referred to as military-style semi-automatic weapons.


    An example of assault weapon legislation is the Federal 1994 Crime Bill. The bill in part outlaws new civilian manufacture of certain semi-automatic assault weapons. It also prohibits new civilian manufacture of "large capacity ammunition feeding devices" declared certain weapons as assault weapons, and states a semi-automatic rifle is an assault weapon if it can accept a detachable magazine and has two or more of the following:
    • A folding or telescoping stock
    • A pistol grip
    • A bayonet mount
    • A flash suppressor, or threads to attach one
    • A grenade launcher.
    • Or whatever the hell they can come up with
    You forgot "holds one or more rounds of small arms ammunition"...
    Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...

    Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
    ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?

  5. #25
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    ARVADA (Comcast IP Confirmed)
    Posts
    2,761

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brutal View Post
    Just overhead on KUSA, "...many of these weapons are easily converted to fully-automatic." really? On whose authority did they get this bit of misinformation?

    On another note, overheard on a flight home this morning (been up since 0300 EST so I'm tired and cranky anyway), "There's no reason anyone should ever be allowed to own an assault weapon or handgun." We all know there are so many issues with that statement - our rights, bad guys, simple logic, etc.

    This same libtard decided it was OK to endanger a whole airplane full of people by taking video/pictures out the window on approach with his Chinese iPad knockoff tablet. Yes, I know the Mythbusters proved no harm, no foul on phones, but HE was breaking the laws put in place by the FAA to protect the flying public and rules by the airline because they can't possibly test all this odd crap.

    They just don't see the hypocrisy of their words and actions. Had this event not just unfolded, he would have gotten an earful on both accounts.

    No offense, but your being as whiney as the libtard. I flew 3-5 times a week for 3 years and routinely left my phone on in my pocket on my flights and NEVER experienced anything other than a smooth flight.
    There is no flipping way that a cell phone is going to mess up anything with the plane other that the intercom scratchyness when the captain comes over to tell you they are about to start the approach.

  6. #26
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    ARVADA (Comcast IP Confirmed)
    Posts
    2,761

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brutal View Post
    Just overhead on KUSA, "...many of these weapons are easily converted to fully-automatic." really? On whose authority did they get this bit of misinformation?

    On another note, overheard on a flight home this morning (been up since 0300 EST so I'm tired and cranky anyway), "There's no reason anyone should ever be allowed to own an assault weapon or handgun." We all know there are so many issues with that statement - our rights, bad guys, simple logic, etc.

    This same libtard decided it was OK to endanger a whole airplane full of people by taking video/pictures out the window on approach with his Chinese iPad knockoff tablet. Yes, I know the Mythbusters proved no harm, no foul on phones, but HE was breaking the laws put in place by the FAA to protect the flying public and rules by the airline because they can't possibly test all this odd crap.

    They just don't see the hypocrisy of their words and actions. Had this event not just unfolded, he would have gotten an earful on both accounts.
    Also have you ever heard of airplane mode for a tablet or iphone etc?

  7. #27
    Chairman Emeritus (Retired Admin) Marlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Westminster,Colorado
    Posts
    10,139

    Default

    Well, seems we have most of the media registered here now, Here's your chane to educate them.
    Sarcasm, Learn it, Know it, Live it....



    Marlin is the end all be all of everything COAR-15...
    Spleify 7-27-12

  8. #28
    Mr Yamaha brutal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Unincorporated Douglas County, CO
    Posts
    13,962

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DD977GM2 View Post
    No offense, but your being as whiney as the libtard. I flew 3-5 times a week for 3 years and routinely left my phone on in my pocket on my flights and NEVER experienced anything other than a smooth flight.
    There is no flipping way that a cell phone is going to mess up anything with the plane other that the intercom scratchyness when the captain comes over to tell you they are about to start the approach.
    Hey, I've had my phone ring at 5k on approach because I forgot to turn it off during a flight. My point wasn't the perceived, inherent, likely non-existent danger - note that the FAA has approved use only while IN-FLIGHT - my point was the hypocrisy of the situation.

    Sadly, you chose to take the ad-hominem approach instead of keeping it about the intent of my post.
    My Feedback
    Credit TFOGGER : Liberals only want things to be "fair and just" if it benefits them.
    Credit Zundfolge: The left only supports two "rights"; Buggery and Infanticide.
    Credit roberth: List of things Government does best; 1. Steal your money 2. Steal your time 3. Waste the money they stole from you. 4. Waste your time making you ask permission for things you have a natural right to own. "Anyone that thinks the communists won't turn off your power for being on COAR15 is a fucking moron."

  9. #29
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    ARVADA (Comcast IP Confirmed)
    Posts
    2,761

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brutal View Post
    Hey, I've had my phone ring at 5k on approach because I forgot to turn it off during a flight. My point wasn't the perceived, inherent, likely non-existent danger - note that the FAA has approved use only while IN-FLIGHT - my point was the hypocrisy of the situation.

    Sadly, you chose to take the ad-hominem approach instead of keeping it about the intent of my post.
    Hypocrisy abound. I understand and for me at that momnet, RIF and I failed.

  10. #30
    Stircrazy Jer jerrymrc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    8,166

    Default

    Back to the topic. I have not watched much coverage but did catch the police brief. Was it just me or did Mr "clip" seem to want to reinforce that much of the stuff ammo, mags were bought on the INTERNET ?

    Not sure where he was trying to go with it but he seemed to act like buying things on the net was bad. Not sure what or why because ammo sales are regulated just like buying at wally world if not more so.

    Just a thought.
    I see you running, tell me what your running from

    Nobody's coming, what ya do that was so wrong.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •