Even if he had armor, even level iv, I gotta believe a pistol round from ten yards to the chest would still hurt like hell and maybe knock him wouldn't it? An untrained person like him id think it would at least scare the crap out of him
Even if he had armor, even level iv, I gotta believe a pistol round from ten yards to the chest would still hurt like hell and maybe knock him wouldn't it? An untrained person like him id think it would at least scare the crap out of him
As long as the thread is moving towards culture this is an interesting angle. Kind of at right angles to the gun discussion.
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/20...o-the-concept/
Batman Movies Don’t Kill. But They’re Friendly to the Concept
Steve
So, if "the alleged suspect" is entitled to rights of fair trial, appeals, yadda yadda, would a CCW holder taking him out on the spot be violating his rights to those things, and therefore be wrong? I mean, it's confusing. Seems like it would have been OK for someone to cap him on the spot in the act, but not after they catch him afterwards still armed and blood-spattered?
From what I've heard, he'd taken a shitload of Vicodin beforehand and was probably too loaded to shoot himself. That's probably why they caught him, he was too fucked up to decide whether to leave or not.
Oh yeah it would. Buddy of mine back in the early days of the iraq war (OIF) was hit in the chest with a 9mm wearing level 4. Said it hurt like shit and cracked the plate. Would hurt less then wearing level 3A but a few good shots to the chest would either make him run or drop him due to injury from the impact forces. Bullet "proof" vests dont protect from the blunt forces just the bullet going through you. In some cases you would rather have the bullet put a hole in you then be stopped.