Close
Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 70
  1. #41
    Grand Master Know It All 68Charger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Canton, TX
    Posts
    3,721

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jake View Post
    I think the time has come for us to be reasonable too. Surely we can come to some kind of compromise here, after all we all condemn these kind of massacres and want to do everything in our power to prevent them from happening again.

    I would be all in favour of agreeing to limit high capacity clips to say, ten rounds maximum, if they would agree to allow us to keep our 'assault rifles' and 'AK47s' and barrel shrouds. Who's with me?

    Sure, you can limit my "clips" to 10 rounds, as long as the legislation clearly defines a "clip" correctly, and that definition does NOT include magazines...
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ, we are the III%, CIP2, and some other catchphrase meant to aggravate progreSSives who are hell bent on taking rights away...

  2. #42
    Paper Hunter revor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Longmont
    Posts
    120

    Default

    She needs to learn the difference between clips and magazines
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails clips.jpg   magazines.jpg  

  3. #43
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by flan7211 View Post
    No damnit, not one more curb of our rights. This is not about what can be used in a crime, or hunters, or anything other than the principles of our constitution. We are a people based on popular sovereignty do not take away any of the their insurance against tyranny.
    How would a requirement that certain products be purchased face to face rather than online be a curb of rights? Let's assume no paperwork is required. I don't actually consider this to be a solution that would work, but the right to shop on the Internet isn't a constitutional one.

  4. #44
    High Power Shooter flan7211's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    893

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rucker61 View Post
    How would a requirement that certain products be purchased face to face rather than online be a curb of rights? Let's assume no paperwork is required. I don't actually consider this to be a solution that would work, but the right to shop on the Internet isn't a constitutional one.
    Ok how about the limit on online sales is a true violation of the interstate commerce clause? Interstate commerce meant regulating states ability to put duties and tariffs on each other not regulate consumer goods just because they cross state lines.

    Storefront you are forced to pay taxes while online you don't. Storefront faggot will upcharge it making it more expensive. So they can funnel our freedoms into nice little avenues that can be easily shut down later.

  5. #45
    kanekutter05
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rucker61 View Post
    If you can afford suppressors and SBRs, you don't need to rob anyone. What if you could only buy large capacity mags in a storefront, not via online sales?
    But would you have to go through a background check in order to get one?

  6. #46
    Varmiteer jake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Broomfield
    Posts
    536

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 68Charger View Post
    Sure, you can limit my "clips" to 10 rounds, as long as the legislation clearly defines a "clip" correctly, and that definition does NOT include magazines...

    "A lot of people seem obliged to have a viewpoint."

  7. #47
    Fallen Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Smyrna, GA
    Posts
    6,748

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rucker61 View Post
    If you can afford suppressors and SBRs, you don't need to rob anyone. What if you could only buy large capacity mags in a storefront, not via online sales?
    Storefronts like "firing line" already jack the prices to almost double the online cost.

    why is the elimination of a free market a good idea again?

  8. #48
    Grand Master Know It All hatidua's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    boulder
    Posts
    4,099

    Default

    Getting hung up on the distinction between magazine and clip, and the fact that the media uses them interchangeably is a distraction. They want the overall capacity of a given firearm reduced, the wording they use is somewhat irrelevant to all but a few folk that are semantically obsessed or trying to drive up their post count.

  9. #49
    High Power Shooter Wiggity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    C Rock
    Posts
    901

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by hatidua View Post
    Getting hung up on the distinction between magazine and clip, and the fact that the media uses them interchangeably is a distraction. They want the overall capacity of a given firearm reduced, the wording they use is somewhat irrelevant to all but a few folk that are semantically obsessed or trying to drive up their post count.

    this is true, if a bill is passed, the lawyers who write it will not overlook that small detail

  10. #50
    Bang Bang Ridge's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cedar Park, TX
    Posts
    8,307

    Default

    I posted on her Facebook wall

    Ms DeGette, what do you plan to do to curtail dangerous drivers on the road? I'd like to ask you to consider a ban on high capacity fuel tanks. With today's modern fuel efficiency, there is no need for people to be able to travel hundreds of miles on a single tank of gas.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •