Marriage Vs Marriage.. A question

[Tristan]

This thread started good. Now it is just sad.
So where do you draw the line? You going to say next that pedophilia is okay?
You think that my argument holds no water-but you are comparing apples and oranges. Use your brain. My statement makes perfect sense and is undeniable.
And again-some of you call yourselves conservatives-but you are so far left it is sick. You want to pick and choose when you are right or left.
Interesting.
If you want to be a fag or a fag lover, go ahead. It still is a limited free country.
But if you think all the minority groups should have equal rights, then you know nothing of history or the way things work. Once you give equality to the minority, the majority loses their rights. That's all there is to it.

[Tristan]

How many orgasms have you had? How many kids have you had?

None of your fucking business. WTF is wrong with you asking that kind of question?

[kanekutter05]

I move to nominate Tristan to succeed me as the biggest asshat on this forum. Any 2nds?

[jake]

This thread started good. Now it is just sad.
So where do you draw the line? You going to say next that pedophilia is okay?

How about this line just off the top of my head?

Two consenting adults of any gender. There you go, no women marrying their horses or men marrying eight year old girls. Simple.

[BushMasterBoy]

You are both equal! Hurray!

[Rucker61]

None of your fucking business. WTF is wrong with you asking that kind of question?

If the purpose of sex is reproduction, it should be a one to one ratio, right?

[Byte Stryke]

Ok I lied I guess I do have something to add...you really cannot take a single verse out of the Bible and use it for or against any viewpoint. Historical context and the context within the original language are really crucial to understanding any Bible verse. Christians are as wrong for solely using the Leviticus verses as justification against being gay as non-Christians are for using verses to have the "gotcha" moment towards Christians for not following the Old Testament to a T. Context, context, context...

my comment was meant more for the fair weather Christians, Blasphemers, Heretics and hypocrites.

Like this guy...





but then:
So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said to them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone [at her].
John 8:7

[clublights]

I'm Not trying to put anyone on a target here I just have a few questions/ statements to make on a few of the posts made...

I don't care one way or the other. Same sex couples should be able to share health benefits and any other medical or legal benefits heterosexual couples enjoy.
The issue i do have is a same sex couple demanding a House of Worship perform a wedding for them. IF the church does not want to perform one great, their choice. Do not threaten court action, protest, etc just because you cannot get your way.
Get married at the courthouse, justice of the peace, even vegas. Just don't force a religious entity to do something they are opposed to.

I agree that no one can tell a church what to do . if the church says nope not gunna do it then there you have it . their church their rules. Of course the flip side of that coin is what if the church said not gunna marry a black couple.. would that still be ok ? I wanna say no it would not be .. but then again their church their rules... kinda confusing in my head. ... of course this still brings up the original question how does it hurt traditional marriage ?

Because it is sick and wrong. And so is anybody who supports it.
And before some ignorant idiot says I'm a homophobe, I'm not. Anybody that knows me knows I'm not afraid of shit. That's just another term the libbies used that too many of you wanna be right-wingers have adopted.
And if anybody needs a common sense answer, it's quite simple. It is unnatural. Same sex cannot reproduce, which is why we have sex organs anyways.
Duh.

Ok I see this point of view.. I disagree to a point of it . but again what does sick and wrong have to do with harming traditional Marriage ? which is the original question .

Because you put children in the middle when they adopt. That child did not have a choice.
I'm all for gay divorce, gay child support, gay alimony! Didn't the first couple to marry in CA divorce already?

Admit it ... watching gay divorce court on TV would be funny as all hell ....

"They" are just in the process of getting a "foot in the door". Next, some joker will want to "marry" his sheep or horse or cow. What the hell next? I do NOT want to see my insurance rates go up because my insurance company now has to pay benefits for some person who was not entitled to insurance but is suddenly covered by a new same sex spouse. Hey, my belief and I am entitled to one but it's also your right to see this in a totally different way.
OK, I have my flame resistant suit on so flame away at this point.

Is beastiality a huge problem ( as in happening a lot ) ?

Mass shootings are not a common issue. yet folks think taking away "hi cap clips" will solve the issue. we all know that the " hi cap clips" have nothing to do with the issue.
See what I did there?

How does insurance have to do with harming traditional marriage tho ??? again the original question

Anyone concerned that people will get married just to get benefits of health insurance, etc?

I know for a FACT This happens already with hetro couples.

[kanekutter05]

You are both equal! Hurray!

Damn!

[clublights]

I move to nominate Tristan to succeed me as the biggest asshat on this forum. Any 2nds?

Remember that part at the start where I said lets act like adults....

yeah your failing on that right now .