Marriage has had many meanings over the course of our species' history: monogamy, polygamy, polyandry, plural marriages, contact marriages (with a set term), totemic marriages, ad infinitum. Biologically, marriage serves the purpose of providing for the welfare of children until they can provide for themselves and are ready to reproduce. Given our current level of civilization and technology, the likelihood is that a homosexual couple that adopts a child is equally as capable of this as a heterosexual one.
Light a fire for a man, and he'll be warm for a day, light a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life...
Discussion is an exchange of intelligence. Argument is an exchange of
ignorance. Ever found a liberal that you can have a discussion with?
The Great Kazoo's Feedback
"when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".
What is my joy if all hands, even the unclean, can reach into it? What is my wisdom, if even the fools can dictate to me? What is my freedom, if all creatures, even the botched and impotent, are my masters? What is my life, if I am but to bow, to agree and to obey?
-- Ayn Rand, Anthem (Chapter 11)
The Great Kazoo's Feedback
"when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".
I Just want to know when we get to line up and stone all of the whores and Heretics for these traditional marriage types!
Deuteronomy 22:13-21
13 If any man take a wife, and go in unto her, and hate her,
14 And give occasions of speech against her, and bring up an evil name upon her, and say, I took this woman, and when I came to her, I found her not a maid:
15 Then shall the father of the damsel, and her mother, take and bring forth the tokens of the damsel's virginity unto the elders of the city in the gate:
16 And the damsel's father shall say unto the elders, I gave my daughter unto this man to wife, and he hateth her;
17 And, lo, he hath given occasions of speech against her, saying, I found not thy daughter a maid; and yet these are the tokens of my daughter's virginity. And they shall spread the cloth before the elders of the city.
18 And the elders of that city shall take that man and chastise him;
19 And they shall amerce him in an hundred shekels of silver, and give them unto the father of the damsel, because he hath brought up an evil name upon a virgin of Israel: and she shall be his wife; he may not put her away all his days.
20 But if this thing be true, and the tokens of virginity be not found for the damsel:
21 Then they shall bring out the damsel to the door of her father's house, and the men of her city shall stone her with stones that she die: because she hath wrought folly in Israel, to play the whore in her father's house: so shalt thou put evil away from among you.
I have to...
You know what else is unnatural? Condoms, breast implants, pacemakers, and 80 year olds with hard-ons. Men who have had vasectomies also cannot reproduce. So to apply your "common sense answer" logic to everything else it is like a bucket with a hole in it, holds no water.![]()
"There is no news in the truth, and no truth in the news."
"The revolution will not be televised... Instead it will be filmed from multiple angles via cell phone cameras, promptly uploaded to YouTube, Tweeted about, and then shared on Facebook, pending a Wi-Fi connection."
Ok I lied I guess I do have something to add...you really cannot take a single verse out of the Bible and use it for or against any viewpoint. Historical context and the context within the original language are really crucial to understanding any Bible verse. Christians are as wrong for solely using the Leviticus verses as justification against being gay as non-Christians are for using verses to have the "gotcha" moment towards Christians for not following the Old Testament to a T. Context, context, context...