Close
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 26
  1. #11
    Machine Gunner Teufelhund's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Elizabeth
    Posts
    1,711

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pancho Villa View Post
    The economy, contrary to Marx, is not a big pie and adding more people do the mix does not "take away jobs" but adds value.
    This concept escapes me. One of my smarter friends has said the same thing you did, and I would like to understand it. Care to explain?

    It seems to me that if you have a finite number of job openings, adding more eligible job applicants to the pool simply increases the number of people out of work. There's obviously something I don't get about how it is a value-add.

  2. #12
    Grand Master Know It All Sharpienads's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    3,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Teufelhund View Post
    This concept escapes me. One of my smarter friends has said the same thing you did, and I would like to understand it. Care to explain?

    It seems to me that if you have a finite number of job openings, adding more eligible job applicants to the pool simply increases the number of people out of work. There's obviously something I don't get about how it is a value-add.
    Marx tried to scare people into being against immigration based on the idea that there are only a finite number of jobs. Thus, anybody that immigrated would take a job away from somebody else. This isn't true, because if you have more people, those people would require services (more food, more houses, etc) and new job opportunities are created.

    Marx was also against emmigration, and wanted to confiscate all property from anybody that wanted to leave (kind of like how NY wants to tax people that move out of the state).

    ETA: I guess the main fallacy is that, like money, the number of jobs is not finite. Money and jobs can both be created without taking away from somebody else.
    Kyle

    Girlscouts? Hmmm, I don't know... I think it's kinda dangerous to teach young girls self esteem and leadership skills.

  3. #13
    kanekutter05
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pancho Villa View Post
    The economy, contrary to Marx, is not a big pie and adding more people do the mix does not "take away jobs" but adds value.
    Quote Originally Posted by Teufelhund View Post
    This concept escapes me. One of my smarter friends has said the same thing you did, and I would like to understand it. Care to explain?

    It seems to me that if you have a finite number of job openings, adding more eligible job applicants to the pool simply increases the number of people out of work. There's obviously something I don't get about how it is a value-add.
    If you are coming from the business side of the economy then the larger the workforce the better. More candidates for jobs means you can be more selective and get someone with the skills you really need/want, not just a body to fill a chair. This also can drive up wages because companies need to be competitive in pay in order to attract the best candidates.

    BUT, when you add hundreds of thousands of people who are in this country illegally into that pool it suddenly becomes very damaging to the whole situation. Instead of companies paying competitively in order to attract talent...workers begin negotiating a lower and lower pay in order to get the job over another in the out-of-work pool (which is now vastly bigger).

    Quote Originally Posted by Ronin13 View Post
    I'm sorry, I don't understand this logic. So if we have 100 job openings in one town, and there are 150 people out of work (logic assumes that 50 people will still be out of work) and then all of a sudden you add in 100 more people that are legally eligible to work, that someone adds value? So 100 jobs, 250 workers, somehow that's going to prompt people to all of a sudden go, yes, we have more workers! YAY! No. Wrong. Unless it is financially possible and beneficial, jobs won't be suddenly created because the work force grows. If people want to become legal citizens in this country, let them do it the right way, not weasel them in because "they've been here for a while illegally."
    +1 preach it Ronin!

  4. #14
    Ammocurious Rucker61's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Fort Collins, CO, USA
    Posts
    3,359

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kanekutter05 View Post
    BUT, when you add hundreds of thousands of people who are in this country illegally into that pool it suddenly becomes very damaging to the whole situation. Instead of companies paying competitively in order to attract talent...workers begin negotiating a lower and lower pay in order to get the job over another in the out-of-work pool (which is now vastly bigger).
    Just what jobs to you think these folks going to be getting?

  5. #15
    Zombie Slayer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    6,978

    Default Collect the fee...

    I bet they just collect the fee of $465 then stamp "DENIED"...next!

  6. #16
    Grand Master Know It All Sharpienads's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    3,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kanekutter05 View Post
    BUT, when you add hundreds of thousands of people who are in this country illegally into that pool it suddenly becomes very damaging to the whole situation. Instead of companies paying competitively in order to attract talent...workers begin negotiating a lower and lower pay in order to get the job over another in the out-of-work pool (which is now vastly bigger).
    Right, immigration needs to flucuate with the economy. If you have a huge influx of people during a recession (like right now), it's only going to make things worse.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rucker61 View Post
    Just what jobs to you think these folks going to be getting?
    Most likely low paying, low skilled jobs where employers can pay them under the table, possibly pay them less than what their labor is actually worth, and not have to pay taxes.
    Kyle

    Girlscouts? Hmmm, I don't know... I think it's kinda dangerous to teach young girls self esteem and leadership skills.

  7. #17
    Gong Shooter Ed_S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Hancock, ME (Population - not very many!)
    Posts
    327

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pancho Villa View Post

    Why not just legislate that everyone make $100/hr? .
    Be damned if I'm taking a salary cut!


    I'm all for simplifying the immigration process, as long as you're here to pay taxes etc. But we make it so easy for illegals to come and stay here and bleed the economy dry.

  8. #18
    Varmiteer
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    golden
    Posts
    650

    Default

    Being a brick mason I could tell you how I'm affected by illegal immigration.

    I'm told wages have sky rocketed in Arizona for masons. I wonder why?

  9. #19
    Grand Master Know It All Sharpienads's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    3,403

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by CapLock View Post
    Being a brick mason I could tell you how I'm affected by illegal immigration.

    I'm told wages have sky rocketed in Arizona for masons. I wonder why?
    You're just mad because you got flipped off today
    Kyle

    Girlscouts? Hmmm, I don't know... I think it's kinda dangerous to teach young girls self esteem and leadership skills.

  10. #20
    Gives a sh!t; pretends he doesn't HoneyBadger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    C-Springs again! :)
    Posts
    14,824
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sharpienads View Post
    You're just mad because you got flipped off today
    Too soon!
    My Feedback

    "When law and morality contradict each other, the citizen has the cruel alternative of either losing his moral sense or losing his respect for the law." -Frederic Bastiat

    "I am a conservative. Quite possibly I am on the losing side; often I think so. Yet, out of a curious perversity I had rather lose with Socrates, let us say, than win with Lenin."
    ― Russell Kirk, Author of The Conservative Mind

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •