Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Hatchet Sushi Master Rooskibar03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vail, AZ
    Posts
    2,774

    Default OC prohibited in Lakewood open space?

    So I'm finally trying to get some exercise again and since my home backs up to the Bear Creek Trail I went out for a few miles.

    I come across one of the "trail boards" with the map and rules of the open space and there is an 8.5x11 piece of paper taped to the board with the following message.

    "Open Carrying of firearms is prohibited. Ordinance 9.32.050"

    A. The open carrying or wearing of a firearm within or upon the grounds of any community center, recreational facility, the Lakewood Civic Center, City park, City trail, or City open space including any City owned, operated, or leased building or property is unlawful when said City building or City property is posted with a sign at the entrance to any City building or City property informing persons that the open carrying of a firearm is prohibited in such building or area.
    I'm pretty sure I've seen this come up before but is simply taping a sign to board suffient to fulfill the law? There are trails into the open space everywhere, so how can you post a sign at the "entrance"?
    Progressive ideology, ideas so good they must be mandatory.
    Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.

  2. #2
    Hello, my name is: KNOWN Gunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Parker
    Posts
    4,636

    Default

    Take it down

  3. #3
    Zombie Slayer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Pueblo
    Posts
    6,978

    Default Federal Law

    There ought to be a federal law against this. But then again all our rights spelled out in the constitution are infringed upon all the time. We are not the priveleged class, for instance I bet a federal judge seen carrying in the park would not be cited there by the local cops. We are just peons...

  4. #4
    kanekutter05
    Guest

    Default

    I'm not a lawyer...but my understanding is state law preempts local ordinances with the exception of the city and county of Denver.

  5. #5
    Hatchet Sushi Master Rooskibar03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vail, AZ
    Posts
    2,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kanekutter05 View Post
    I'm not a lawyer...but my understanding is state law preempts local ordinances with the exception of the city and county of Denver.
    That was the first thing that came to mind also.
    Progressive ideology, ideas so good they must be mandatory.
    Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.

  6. #6
    kanekutter05
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rooskibar03 View Post
    That was the first thing that came to mind also.
    But that's not to say you wouldn't be hassled and/or arrested, but my guess is that you would win the fight pretty easily utilizing any competent lawyer. It's just matter of you wanting to spend the time to fight it.

  7. #7
    Hatchet Sushi Master Rooskibar03's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Vail, AZ
    Posts
    2,774

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kanekutter05 View Post
    But that's not to say you wouldn't be hassled and/or arrested, but my guess is that you would win the fight pretty easily utilizing any competent lawyer. It's just matter of you wanting to spend the time to fight it.
    Thankfully I don't plan of OC while jogging, (hell concealed while jogging int practical) so its not an issue per say.

    Doesn't mean I'm ok with them trying to infringe.
    Progressive ideology, ideas so good they must be mandatory.
    Your freedom to be you includes my freedom to be free from you.

  8. #8
    QUITTER Irving's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    46,527
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kanekutter05 View Post
    I'm not a lawyer...but my understanding is state law preempts local ordinances with the exception of the city and county of Denver.
    You are correct, except there is no state law that says you can open carry, so it is not an issue for them to say you can't OC on city land. This is the case for most city owned parks in the metro area.
    "There are no finger prints under water."

  9. #9
    Machine Gunner Circuits's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Colofornia Springs, CO
    Posts
    2,411

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kanekutter05 View Post
    I'm not a lawyer...but my understanding is state law preempts local ordinances with the exception of the city and county of Denver.
    State law devolved the open carry questions to local governments, at the same time it reserved regulation of CCW to the state.

    The only exception to state pre-emption is that Denver was allowed to keep its home-grown "AW Ban" on magazines over 20 rounds.
    "The only real difference between the men and the boys, is the number and size, and cost of their toys."
    NRA Life, GOA Life, SAF Life, CSSA Life, NRA Certified Instructor Circuits' Feedback

  10. #10
    Guest
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Castle Rock
    Posts
    3,254

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Circuits View Post
    State law devolved the open carry questions to local governments, at the same time it reserved regulation of CCW to the state.

    The only exception to state pre-emption is that Denver was allowed to keep its home-grown "AW Ban" on magazines over 20 rounds.
    Was it not allowed to also keep it's OC in effect also? As in the city of Denver does not allow OC anywhere....

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •