Close
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 45
  1. #21
    Don of the Asian Mafia ChunkyMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    8,397
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    John Xia supposedly of UTG/Leaper supports JT's stand. LOL since when LEO/pro use UTG products?
    Quote Originally Posted by crays View Post
    It doesn't matter how many rifles you buy...they're still cheaper than one wife, in the long run.
    Coarf Feedback
    Instagram

  2. #22
    Door Kicker Mick-Boy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Fremont County
    Posts
    1,578

    Default

    RECOIL well and truly stepped in it. Panteo Productions and ITS tactical have pulled their advertising.

    Turns out regurgitating the Brady Campaign's talking points isn't good business for a gun magazine. Who knew?
    Mick-Boy

    "Men who carry rifles for a living do not seek reward outside the guild. The most cherished gift...is a nod from his peers."


    nsrconsulting.net

  3. #23
    Crusade Eating Porker
    Join Date
    Jun 2012
    Location
    Southeast Denver
    Posts
    608

    Default

    The Facebook comments are priceless, they range from complete and utter rage to "ill still buy Recoil, you guys are butthurt, and you can go pound sand."

    The last thing we need is to give the Brady Campaign this kind of ammunition. There is no sporting clause in 2A, it was designed so the people were to be just as well armed as the military.

  4. #24
    Gong Shooter
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    475

    Default

    That whole "the founding fathers never envisioned us having full auto, military style, blah blah blah" arguing meant is so laughable to me.

    On the contrary, the founding fathers knew that their civilians/citizens would be armed with the exact same weapons as their military. We may laugh at a black powder, single shot rifle/pistol/canon nowadays, but those were high-tech military grade weapons of those times.

    Sounds to me like the founding fathers WANTED the civilians/citizens to have as much of an even playing field with the military as possible.

    You know, that whole "checks and balances thing."

    But I digress.
    Whenever my wife asks me why I never wear pants around the house I simply remind her:

    "A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on.” - Winston Churchill

    The truth wears NO pants!

  5. #25
    Gong Shooter
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    pueblo, co
    Posts
    288

    Default

    After only four issues has to be a record

  6. #26
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    ARVADA (Comcast IP Confirmed)
    Posts
    2,761

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by porfiriozg View Post
    After only four issues has to be a record

    I was wondering how many issues they had produced.


    What a bunch of retards.

    Bravo Company has pulled their adds also from them

  7. #27
    Retired Admin
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    12,932

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by BushMasterBoy View Post
    Damn, Reed Knight has an outrageous collection of firearms and armor. Space Coast economy is desperate since the Space Shuttle quit flying. Found this place from the "Recoil" magazine online. Makes me want to go back to my old neighborhood!

    http://www.instmiltech.com/hall-of-modern-arms.html


    I admit I have an HK product. VP70Z "Z" stands for "zivilian". First polymer pistol ever. Only has like 4 moving parts...


    HELL OF A TRIGGER PULL! My co worker has one he wanted to trade me.

  8. #28
    Retired Admin
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Aurora
    Posts
    12,932

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by mevshooter View Post
    That whole "the founding fathers never envisioned us having full auto, military style, blah blah blah" arguing meant is so laughable to me.

    On the contrary, the founding fathers knew that their civilians/citizens would be armed with the exact same weapons as their military. We may laugh at a black powder, single shot rifle/pistol/canon nowadays, but those were high-tech military grade weapons of those times.

    Sounds to me like the founding fathers WANTED the civilians/citizens to have as much of an even playing field with the military as possible.

    You know, that whole "checks and balances thing."

    But I digress.

    I agree 100% but I'm soo getting tired of trying to make uninformed people understand this.

  9. #29
    Varmiteer lead_magnet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Fowler
    Posts
    627

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mazin View Post
    I agree 100% but I'm soo getting tired of trying to make uninformed people understand this.
    Hey, quite a few of the "uniformed people" get this.

  10. #30
    Don of the Asian Mafia ChunkyMonkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Centennial, CO
    Posts
    8,397
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    get what?
    Quote Originally Posted by crays View Post
    It doesn't matter how many rifles you buy...they're still cheaper than one wife, in the long run.
    Coarf Feedback
    Instagram

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •