Close
Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Foothills (outside denver)
    Posts
    4,584

    Default Bush done GOOD???

    Does anyone know of, or can see, any down side to this?

    http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/relea.../20070817.html

    I know it has nothing to do with the 2nd.

  2. #2
    Machine Gunner BadShot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Centennial
    Posts
    1,614

    Default

    Yeah, DOI (department of interior) will take at least 5 years to even think about implimenting it. Having a little inside understanding of at least a few affected agencies within DOI, it isn't that they don't approve of hunting, it's that they have very limited staffing and that directive doesn't associate additional funding to make it happen. Thus it is a low priority and like I said to start.. several years in coming.

  3. #3
    Grand Master Know It All HunterCO's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Columbus, MT
    Posts
    2,860

    Default

    I would prefer the feds stayed out of it and left it up to game and fish. I have little to no faith in the feds and all their bureaucracy.
    "The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion." (Edmund Burke 1784)

  4. #4
    Machine Gunner thedave1164's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Evans, Colorado
    Posts
    1,804

    Default

    Federal interference in the state F&G laws screwed up the season and limits in Alaska. It really sucked for people living there that relied on hunting to provide food for year. Not to mention the new fishing regs.

    Once again Bush shows his big gov't mentality.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •