Close
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 17
  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Frederick
    Posts
    311

    Default Continuous possession question.

    This may have already been asked (didn't see it though). Will the continuous possession piece of the mag ban affect those of us who fly with our firearms? When we go to the airport, declare our unloaded firearm and then hand our baggage (with the firearm and magazine(s) in it) over to the TSA agent in that little room where they scan it and check it before sending us on our merry little way... does that count as NON-continuous possession? And if so... does that mean we can no longer fly with our firearms???

  2. #2
    -DJ-
    Guest

    Default

    I don't think anyone knows. The Governor stated that there would be something forthcoming as the law is written to help clarify the "possession", and the "readily converted" parts of the law...

  3. #3

    Default

    So something that isn;t even known has been made into law? What a crock of shit, how can anyone vote on this, flip a coin ala Hudak??? I guess that's the new mormal for legislators. "Give it your best shot"

  4. #4

    Default

    They intentionally made it vague so they can interpret it however they want and then that interpretation can evolve to whatever they want it to be in the future.

  5. #5
    Zombie Slayer Aloha_Shooter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Colorado Springs, CO
    Posts
    6,530

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by robertcolorado2009 View Post
    I guess that's the new mormal for legislators. "Give it your best shot"
    No, the new normal for Democrat legislators is to claim whatever you think the voters will believe before new elections, claim they didn't read it well enough when errors are pointed out after passage and then distort it to do whatever they want when the dust clears.

  6. #6
    The "Godfather" of COAR Great-Kazoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Washboard Alley, AZ.
    Posts
    48,074

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brobar View Post
    This may have already been asked (didn't see it though). Will the continuous possession piece of the mag ban affect those of us who fly with our firearms? When we go to the airport, declare our unloaded firearm and then hand our baggage (with the firearm and magazine(s) in it) over to the TSA agent in that little room where they scan it and check it before sending us on our merry little way... does that count as NON-continuous possession? And if so... does that mean we can no longer fly with our firearms???
    Really, you're over ANALizing the whole deal. It is "interpreted" to mean not selling, trading or handing off, at least for now. Unless you walk around with them attached to your person, you are never in " continuous possession"
    The Great Kazoo's Feedback

    "when you're happy you enjoy the melody but, when you're broken you understand the lyrics".

  7. #7

    Default

    Words mean what i say they mean

    They are vague on purpose, dont you know you have to pass the law in order to find out what's in it
    Self control: The minds ability to override the body's urge to beat the living sh.. out of some ass.... who desperately deserves it.

    The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government.

    Thomas Jefferson


    Obama, so full of crap it is a miracle Air Force One can even get off the ground,

  8. #8
    Stircrazy Jer jerrymrc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Colorado Springs
    Posts
    8,166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rockhound View Post
    Words mean what i say they mean

    They are vague on purpose, dont you know you have to pass the law in order to find out what's in it
    And we know how well that one is going.
    I see you running, tell me what your running from

    Nobody's coming, what ya do that was so wrong.

  9. #9
    Guest
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Frederick
    Posts
    311

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jim View Post
    Really, you're over ANALizing the whole deal. It is "interpreted" to mean not selling, trading or handing off, at least for now. Unless you walk around with them attached to your person, you are never in " continuous possession"
    I don't see how that is over ANALizing at all. I'm "handing off" my magazine(s) [in my luggage] to TSA agents at an airport... both to and from my destination. I guess you think the law is pretty cut and dry and there is an "implied" but surefire exemption for traveling with firearms through an airport? I didn't think it was OBVIOUSly cut and dry at all but maybe I'm missing something.

  10. #10
    Machine Gunner merl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    longmont
    Posts
    1,802

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brobar View Post
    I don't see how that is over ANALizing at all. I'm "handing off" my magazine(s) [in my luggage] to TSA agents at an airport... both to and from my destination. I guess you think the law is pretty cut and dry and there is an "implied" but surefire exemption for traveling with firearms through an airport? I didn't think it was OBVIOUSly cut and dry at all but maybe I'm missing something.
    that is what it means for now. that is how everyone interpreted it. (I'm afraid I agree with Jim this time)

    The trouble with it, which you hit on, is the literal definition can be used to confiscate them at any time. It is just the same as the Readily converted part. Meaning now is "Don't own an extension if you have a post ban mag." Meaning in the future is any mag with removale a floorplate is verboten.

    It'll be sadly amusing if the day comes when we clamor for them to enforce existing laws and they decide to enforce this one to the letter.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •